Start from an award

Pick an NCI award and see the datasets it is credited on and the articles that came out of them.

Award number

Most connected awardsP30CA008748 177 U24CA143845 33 U24CA143848 32 U24CA143840 31 U24CA143843 31 U24CA143866 31 U24CA143867 31 U24CA143882 31

Or browse a whole slice of the corpus

Reviewed datasets Underexplored GDC PDC HTAN cBioPortal IDC Everything

108 awards, 20 datasets and 96 articles in this slice. Each column draws its best-connected few, because a node shared between two datasets is what makes this a network rather than a list. Pick one award above to see a whole chain.

NCI awards (4 of 108)

Resolved from each dataset's publications through NIH RePORTER

Datasets (5 of 20)

Cohorts these awards are credited on

Articles (6 of 96)

The dataset's own paper plus the reuse studies it ships

The best connected are shown.

Direct evidence: the award is on the paper, or the accession is in the articleWeaker: infrastructure support, or use declared but not shownHover any card to follow its chain

Where the links come from

NIH RePORTER maps a PMID to the awards that reported it. On a dataset’s marker paper that gives the awards which created it; on an article that used the data, the awards which funded that use.

The two sides are not measured alike. Generation is complete: a dataset has one marker paper and every award on it is resolved. Reuse is a sample - the articles using a dataset can number in the thousands, and only the few dozen strongest are retrieved and looked up. Every award shown here funded reuse; there are more that are not shown.

How far it reaches

An award on two datasets paid for both; an article on two combined them. Those shared nodes are why this is a network and not a list.

What is missing

No citable accession means no traceable articles; no authoritative marker paper means no attributable generation award. Absence is a gap in the record. Methods.