Skip to content
Datasets/TARGET-CCSK

Clear Cell Sarcoma of the Kidney

Underused opportunityMixedMachine-extracted
TARGETAvailable from GDC

Can it answer your research question?

1 of 6 supported
  • Overall survival

    Limited

    Vital status is informative for 100% of cases, but too few events or no time to event.API

  • Progression or recurrence

    Not supported

    progression_or_recurrence is informative for no case in the harmonized records.API

  • Treatment response

    Not supported

    treatment_outcome is populated for no case in the harmonized records.API

  • Which drug was given

    Not supported

    therapeutic_agents is recorded for no case in the harmonized records.API

  • Stage-adjusted modelling

    Not supported

    ajcc_pathologic_stage is informative for no case in the harmonized records.API

  • Analysis by race or ethnicity

    Supported

    Race is informative for 100% of cases.API

Judged from the repository’s own field completeness (thresholds). “Not measured” means we have not probed that field for this record, not that the data lack it.

At a glance

Every percentage is the repository’s own record of what is filled in
CasesAPI
13
Measurement types
6
185 files, 466 GB
Follow-upAPI
6.0 years
for 13 of 13 cases; no survival endpoint
Treatment responseAPI
Not recorded

SubjectCALC

Kidney

As filed by the repository

Complex Mixed and Stromal NeoplasmsKidney

Who is in the cohortAPI

A usable value“Not reported” or “unknown”No value recorded
  • Sex13 male
  • Race10 white · 3 black or african american
  • Ethnicity12 not hispanic or latino · 1 hispanic or latino
  • Vital status9 alive · 4 dead

Age at diagnosis

Median 1, middle half 1–2, range 1–3 years across 13 cases.

What was measured, and on how many

6 measurement types, 4 covering the whole cohort.

  • Whole genome sequencing13 of 13 · 100%
  • Bulk RNA sequencing13 of 13 · 100%
  • SNP genotyping array (copy number, germline)11 of 13 · 85%
  • DNA methylation array11 of 13 · 85%
  • Clinical13 of 13 · 100%
  • Structural Variation13 of 13 · 100%
Platform, files and data levels
AssayPlatformFilesLevels
Whole genome sequencingAPIillumina13-
Bulk RNA sequencingAPIillumina91-
SNP genotyping array (copy number, germline)APIillumina44-
DNA methylation arrayAPIillumina33-
ClinicalAPI-3-
Structural VariationAPI-26-
How complete all 29 clinical fields are - 9 informative for at least 80% of cases

A field counts as informative only when it holds a real value. “Not reported” blocks an analysis just as a missing field does. Fields marked 1:n can hold several records per case, so they show the share of cases with any record.

Informative - a usable valuePresent but uninformative - “not reported” or “unknown”Absent - no value recorded

Outcome

  • Vital statusAPI100%
  • Cause of deathAPI31%
  • Progression or recurrenceAPI0%
  • Last known disease statusAPI0%

Follow-up

  • Disease response at follow-upAPI0%
  • Progression at follow-upAPI0%
  • ECOG performance statusAPI0%

Treatment

  • Treatment givenAPI100%
  • Prior treatmentAPI0%
  • Treatment typeAPI0%
  • Therapeutic agentsAPI0%
  • Treatment outcomeAPI0%
  • Regimen or line of therapyAPI0%

Staging

  • AJCC pathologic stageAPI0%
  • AJCC clinical stageAPI0%

Diagnosis

  • Primary diagnosisAPI100%
  • Tissue or organ of originAPI100%
  • Prior malignancyAPI0%
  • Synchronous malignancyAPI0%

Pathology

  • Morphology (ICD-O)API100%
  • Classification of tumorAPI100%
  • Tumor gradeAPI0%

Demographics

  • Sex at birthAPI100%
  • RaceAPI100%
  • EthnicityAPI100%
  • Population groupAPI0%
  • Country of residenceAPI0%

Exposure

  • Tobacco smoking statusAPI0%
  • Alcohol historyAPI0%

Access

MixedSome components are open; others need approval.

Data Access Request through dbGaP using an eRA Commons account; institutional signing official approval required

Open components
72 open-access files
Controlled components
113 controlled-access files
Typical turnaround
days to a few weeks after signing official approval
License
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy terms
Citation requirement
Cite the dataset accession and the program's publication guidelines; see the GDC publication policy.

What it is good for

Written and checked by a reviewer, not generated from metadata.

No reviewed research questions yet. The measurements and field completeness above are machine-extracted and still useful for judging fit.

What it cannot tell you

Written by a reviewer against the source, not inferred from what is missing.

No reviewed limitations yet. Check the field completeness chart above before committing to an analysis. Low coverage on an endpoint you need is the most common blocker.

Who has used it

Articles that analyzed these data, counted separately from articles that only cited the paper. Only the first counts as reuse.

Analyzed the dataCALC2
4
accession in the methods section
Declared using it
0
named in a data availability statement
Cited the paper
-
attention to the publication, not reuse of the data
Against expectation
Well below
about 18 articles expected; index -1.95

What articles did with it

Only the last row counts as reuse. Where the accession appears in an article tells us what the authors did with the data.

  • Mentioned the dataset1
  • Accession found in text5
  • Declared using it0
  • Analyzed the data4

Against comparable datasets

4 articles analyzed these data. About 18 would be expected. The expectation comes from a model of size, age, breadth and access tier.

  • Analyzed it4
  • Expected~18
More articles are listed below than the count
The headline count is deliberately narrow: one section of one accession (METHODS:"phs000466"), so every dataset in the corpus is counted the same way and the numbers can be compared. The 9 articles listed below were retrieved and graded one at a time, and an article counts as having analyzed the data wherever the accession sits in the analysis - methods, results, tables, figures or supplement - under any of this dataset’s accessions. Read the list as the evidence about these articles, and the count as the number that is comparable across datasets.
Why this is an underused opportunity
  • 4 article(s) reference this dataset's accession in a methods section, against 18.4 predicted for datasets of comparable size, age, modality breadth and access tier (reuse gap index -1.95 on a log2 scale, 13th percentile of the assessed corpus).

Compared against 132 datasets in this corpus with a citable accession and sufficient metadata. See Methods for the model.

Articles that analyzed the data

Each was retrieved and graded individually.

Deep-review sample: author overlap and funding were checked only for the 10 articles listed here, not for every article examined. Of the 9 that analyzed the data, author overlap with the generating team could not be checked for any of them, and 5 of the 9 we could check were themselves NCI-funded. These are sample counts, not population estimates.

1 article with weaker evidence

These name the dataset, but we could not confirm the data were analyzed. Shown for completeness and not counted as reuse.

Community examples

Share your example

Analyses someone ran on these data end to end, each with a receipt recording when it ran, against which packages and for how long.

Nobody has shared an analysis of this dataset yet. The examples on other datasets cover the common patterns and can be adapted - and if you adapt one, it belongs here.

Start here

Starter code generated from this record’s own identifiers, then the access steps.

Get the data in code

GDC: list open files and download thempython

Open-access files need no account. Controlled files need an approved dbGaP request and a token passed to gdc-client.

import json, requests

PROJECT = "TARGET-CCSK"
filters = {"op": "and", "content": [
    {"op": "in", "content": {"field": "cases.project.project_id", "value": [PROJECT]}},
    {"op": "in", "content": {"field": "access", "value": ["open"]}},
]}
params = {"filters": json.dumps(filters),
          "fields": "file_id,file_name,data_category,data_type,file_size",
          "size": "10000", "format": "JSON"}
files = requests.get("https://api.gdc.cancer.gov/files", params=params, timeout=60).json()["data"]["hits"]
print(len(files), "open files")

# Write a manifest and fetch with the GDC client (https://gdc.cancer.gov/access-data/gdc-data-transfer-tool)
with open("manifest.txt", "w") as fh:
    fh.write("id\n" + "\n".join(f["file_id"] for f in files))
# $ gdc-client download -m manifest.txt
GDC: clinical table for every casepython
import json, requests

filters = {"op": "in", "content": {"field": "project.project_id", "value": ["TARGET-CCSK"]}}
params = {"filters": json.dumps(filters), "size": "5000", "format": "TSV",
          "fields": ",".join([
              "submitter_id", "demographic.vital_status", "demographic.days_to_death",
              "diagnoses.days_to_last_follow_up", "diagnoses.ajcc_pathologic_stage",
              "diagnoses.treatments.treatment_type", "diagnoses.treatments.treatment_outcome"])}
tsv = requests.get("https://api.gdc.cancer.gov/cases", params=params, timeout=60).text
open("TARGET-CCSK_clinical.tsv", "w").write(tsv)
This page as data: limitations firstbash
curl -s https://cd2s.vercel.app/data/datasets/gdc-target-ccsk.json | python3 -c '
import json, sys
r = json.load(sys.stdin)
for l in r["limitations"]:
    print(l["severity"].upper(), "-", l["statement"][:120])
print("survival endpoint:", r["longitudinal"]["has_survival_endpoint"], "| treatment response:", r["longitudinal"]["has_treatment_response"])'

Access steps

  1. 1
    Open the project in the GDC Data PortalFor people5 minutes

    Check the portal's current case and file counts before requesting anything; the cohort can change after this record was built.

    https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/projects/TARGET-CCSK

    Generated from repository policy. Check the linked policy before downloading.

  2. 2
    Download the open files without an accountFor peopleminutes to hours, by cohort size

    72 open-access files are marked open access. Add them to a portal cart, export a manifest, and fetch it with the GDC Data Transfer Tool.

    gdc-client download -m gdc_manifest.txt
    https://gdc.cancer.gov/access-data/gdc-data-transfer-tool

    Generated from repository policy. Check the linked policy before downloading.

  3. 3
    Request controlled access through dbGaPFor peopledays to a few weeks after signing official approval

    113 controlled-access files require an approved data access request. The request starts at dbGaP, not in the portal. The relevant study is phs000466.

    Requires: eRA Commons account, institutional signing official approval, dbGaP data access request for phs000466

    https://gdc.cancer.gov/access-data/obtaining-access-controlled-data

    Generated from repository policy. Check the linked policy before downloading.

  4. 4
    Download controlled files with your tokenFor people

    An approved request yields a token. The same manifest fetches nothing controlled without it.

    Requires: approved dbGaP request, GDC authentication token

    gdc-client download -m gdc_manifest.txt -t gdc-user-token.txt
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgi-bin/study.cgi?study_id=phs000466

    Generated from repository policy. Check the linked policy before downloading.

  5. 5
    Query the project from code, with no credentialsFor agents

    The file index is public even where files are not, so an agent can size the cohort before anyone requests access.

    curl -s 'https://api.gdc.cancer.gov/files' --get \
      --data-urlencode 'filters={"op":"in","content":{"field":"cases.project.project_id","value":["TARGET-CCSK"]}}' \
      --data-urlencode 'fields=file_id,file_name,data_type' \
      --data-urlencode 'size=10000' --data-urlencode 'format=TSV'
    https://docs.gdc.cancer.gov/API/Users_Guide/Getting_Started/

    Generated from repository policy. Check the linked policy before downloading.

  6. 6
    Pass the token when the agent needs controlled filesFor agents

    Without a token, an API query may return only the open subset. Compare returned counts with the record before treating them as the whole cohort.

    Requires: GDC authentication token

    curl -H "X-Auth-Token: $GDC_TOKEN" https://api.gdc.cancer.gov/data/<file_id>
    https://docs.gdc.cancer.gov/API/Users_Guide/Getting_Started/

    Generated from repository policy. Check the linked policy before downloading.

Provenance

All of it, and more, is in this record’s JSON.

Identifiers

Versions and verification

Released
1 Jan 2015
Metadata retrieved
18 Sept 2026
Review status
Machine-extracted
Data generation funding
Funded data generation

Funding

Awards resolved through NIH RePORTER. Awards that paid to generate these data are listed apart from awards that paid to reuse them. Both are returns on NCI investment, but different ones.

Funded reuse of these data

  • R50CA211461Open Software and Resource Development Leveraging Next-gen Sequencing Data to Facilitate Computational Analysis of Cancer BiologyBrian HaasFY2016-2020API
  • K08CA273527Pathogenic role of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA Integration and clonal expansion in cervical tumorigenesisAnne Van ArsdaleFY2022-2026API
  • T32CA269052Training Program in Basic and Translational Pediatric Oncology ResearchTIMOTHY P CRIPE, STEPHEN L. LESSNICKFY2022-2026API
  • R01CA272872Understanding Infantile Rhabdomyosarcoma Biology and Therapeutic TargetsGenevieve Claire KendallFY2022-2026API
  • R15CA252996Disrupting two cancer hallmarks with one target: DHX36, the major G-quadruplex helicaseJAMES B OLESENFY2020API
  • R01CA178393Genomic Architecture of LGL LeukemiaThomas P. Loughran, Aakrosh RatanFY2016-2026API

Funded infrastructure or harmonization

  • P50CA217694Project 3: Identifying Targetable Epigenetic and Immuno-Oncologic Vulnerabilities in Synovial SarcomaMarc Ladanyi, SAMUEL SINGERFY2018-2025API
  • P30CA008748Antitumor AssessmentElisa de Stanchina, FRANCESCA M GANYFY1985-2026API
  • U24CA258406The Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) for Cancer ResearchJILL P. MESIROV, James Thomas RobinsonFY2021-2025API
  • U24CA180922Trinity: Transcriptome assembly for genetic and functional analysis of cancerBrian Haas, Eric BanksFY2013-2022API
  • U24CA114766Support for Human Specimen Banking in NCI-Sponsored Clinical Trials-(CGB)Nilsa Del Carmen Ramirez Milan, GREGORY H REAMANFY2005-2014API
  • U10CA098543Children's Oncology Group Chair's GrantPETER C. ADAMSON, GREGORY H REAMANFY2003-2013API
  • U10CA042326NATIONAL WILMS TUMOR STUDY -5DANIEL Michael GREEN, GIULIO J D'ANGIOFY1985-2003API
  • U01CA088131CATEGORIZATION OF WILMS TUMOR BY GENETIC EXPRESSIONElizabeth J PerlmanFY2001-2006API
  • P30CA060553Cancer Center AdministrationAleksandar Zafirovski, LEONIDAS C. PLATANIASFY1993-2026API
  • P30CA142543UT Southwestern Medical Center Simmons Comprehensive Cancer CenterCarlos L Arteaga, Jerry William ShayFY2010-2026API

and 1 more

For softwarerecord JSON