Molecular Profiling to Predict Response to Treatment for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
1,510 children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia from Children's Oncology Group trials, with whole genome sequencing, 8.4 years of median follow-up, and a named treatment regimen and response recorded for every single case.
Can it answer your research question?
4 of 6 supportedOverall survival
SupportedVital status and time are populated; median follow-up 8.3 years; 1,510 cases with follow-up; endpoint: overall survival.API
Progression or recurrence
Supportedprogression_or_recurrenceis informative for 100% of cases.APITreatment response
Supportedtreatment_outcomeis populated for 100% of cases; criteria: complete response, cr-complete response.APIWhich drug was given
Not supportedtherapeutic_agentsis recorded for no case in the harmonized records.APIStage-adjusted modelling
Not supportedajcc_pathologic_stageis informative for no case in the harmonized records.APIAnalysis by race or ethnicity
SupportedEthnicity is informative for 97% of cases.API
At a glance
Every percentage is the repository’s own record of what is filled inSubjectCALC
As filed by the repository
Who is in the cohortAPI
- Sex850 male · 660 female
- Race1,169 white · 89 black or african american · 54 asian · 8 2 other · 190 unknown
- Ethnicity1,128 not hispanic or latino · 333 hispanic or latino · 49 unknown
- Vital status1,133 alive · 136 dead · 241 unknown
Age at diagnosis
What was measured, and on how many
- Whole exome sequencing1,494 of 1,510 · 99%
- Bulk RNA sequencing1,479 of 1,510 · 98%
- Whole genome sequencing1,507 of 1,510 · >99%
- Clinical1,510 of 1,510 · 100%
- Copy Number Variation1,504 of 1,510 · >99%
- Somatic Structural Variation1,504 of 1,510 · >99%
How complete all 29 clinical fields are - 12 informative for at least 80% of cases
Outcome
Follow-up
Treatment
Diagnosis
Demographics
Access
Data Access Request through dbGaP using an eRA Commons account; institutional signing official approval required
- Open components
- 7,459 open-access files
- Controlled components
- 53,372 controlled-access files
- Typical turnaround
- days to a few weeks after signing official approval
- License
- NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy terms
- Citation requirement
- Cite the dataset accession and the program's publication guidelines; see the GDC publication policy.
What it is good for
Written and checked by a reviewer, not generated from metadata.
1. Which genomic features predict failure of protocolised induction therapy in paediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia?
Needs approved accessn ≈ 1,510HUMANTreatment outcome and regimen are populated for 100% of 1,510 cases, and regimen strings name the actual protocol arm, so response can be modeled within a treatment context rather than across an uncontrolled mixture of therapies. Whole genome sequencing on 1,507 cases supports genome-wide discovery at this sample size.
Statistical note: Complete response is the dominant outcome category in a curable disease, so the informative contrast is relapse and residual disease rather than induction failure. Expect a heavily imbalanced outcome and plan the design accordingly.
NeedsWhole genome sequencingBulk RNA sequencingTreatment recordsdiagnoses.treatments.treatment_outcomediagnoses.treatments.regimen_or_line_of_therapy2. Do Hispanic or Latino children carry a different genomic landscape or a different response profile, and does genomics explain any of the known outcome disparity?
Needs approved accessn ≈ 1,461HUMAN333 of 1,510 patients are recorded as Hispanic or Latino - both a substantial absolute number and a substantial share, which is unusual. With treatment held closer to constant by the trial protocol, the ethnicity contrast is less confounded by care access than in an observational cohort.
Statistical note: Ethnicity is self-reported and unknown for 49 cases. Genetic ancestry can be estimated from the germline data and is the more defensible variable for biological claims; report both and do not treat them as interchangeable.
NeedsWhole genome sequencingBulk RNA sequencingTreatment recordsdemographic.ethnicitydiagnoses.treatments.treatment_outcome3. What are the long-term survival determinants in paediatric ALL, given follow-up that extends beyond fifteen years?
Needs approved accessn ≈ 1,268HUMANVital status is informative for 84% of cases and median follow-up is 100.2 months, so late relapse and long-term survival are genuinely observable rather than censored away. Very few genomic cohorts of this size reach this follow-up duration.
Statistical note: 16% of cases have uninformative vital status; check whether missingness is associated with treatment arm before assuming it is uninformative censoring.
NeedsClinical dataOutcome dataWhole genome sequencingdemographic.vital_statusdiagnoses.days_to_last_follow_up4. How do subtype-defining fusions and copy number alterations interact with assigned risk group and delivered therapy?
Needs approved accessn ≈ 1,504HUMANStructural variant and copy number calls exist for 1,504 cases, and the regimen field records the risk-stratified arm each patient received, allowing molecular subtype to be crossed with the therapy actually delivered.
NeedsStructural variantsCopy numberTreatment records
What it cannot tell you
Written by a reviewer against the source, not inferred from what is missing.
Despite complete treatment-outcome coverage, the descriptive treatment fields are empty: treatment type, treatment given and therapeutic agents are all at 0%. The regimen field names the protocol arm, so the therapy is recoverable from trial documentation, but individual drug exposures are not recorded per patient here.
Affects: Drug-specific exposure analysis; Cumulative dose analysis
Mitigation: Map the regimen strings onto the published COG protocol definitions to recover drug composition, and state that mapping explicitly in your methods.
Cause of death is not recorded for any case, so competing risks cannot be separated.
Affects: Competing-risk models; Treatment-related mortality
Mitigation: Restrict to overall survival, or obtain cause of death through the trial group.
Participants are enrolled on cooperative-group trials, which select for access to a participating center and for eligibility criteria that exclude some patients. Outcomes in trial populations are generally better than in the wider patient population.
Affects: Population-level outcome estimates; Generalization to non-trial patients
Mitigation: Frame results as applying to trial-enrolled patients.
Race is unknown for 190 of 1,510 cases, and Black or African American patients number 89, which limits race-stratified analysis even though ethnicity coverage is good.
Affects: Race-stratified subgroup analysis
Mitigation: Prefer genetic ancestry estimated from the germline data for biological claims.
53,372 of 60,831 files are controlled access.
Affects: Any sequence-level analysis
Mitigation: Begin the dbGaP request early.
Not appropriate for
- Estimating paediatric ALL incidence or population survival. - This is a trial-enrolled cohort with no population denominator.HUMAN
- Comparing specific chemotherapy agents head to head. - Per-patient drug exposure is not recorded; only the protocol arm is. Agent-level claims would rest on assumptions about protocol adherence rather than on data.HUMAN
Who has used it
Articles that analyzed these data, counted separately from articles that only cited the paper. Only the first counts as reuse.
What articles did with it
- Mentioned the dataset0
- Accession found in text0
- Declared using it1
- Analyzed the data0
Against comparable datasets
- Analyzed it0
- Expected~4
METHODS:"phs002005"), so every dataset in the corpus is counted the same way and the numbers can be compared. The 6 articles listed below were retrieved and graded one at a time, and an article counts as having analyzed the data wherever the accession sits in the analysis - methods, results, tables, figures or supplement - under any of this dataset’s accessions. Read the list as the evidence about these articles, and the count as the number that is comparable across datasets.- 0 article(s) reference this dataset's accession in a methods section, against 4.2 predicted for datasets of comparable size, age, modality breadth and access tier (reuse gap index -2.37 on a log2 scale, 7th percentile of the assessed corpus).
Articles that analyzed the data
Community examples
Share your exampleAnalyses someone ran on these data end to end, each with a receipt recording when it ran, against which packages and for how long.
Which classes of analysis do this cohort's clinical records actually support, and which are ruled out before I request access?
Audit whether this dataset can answer your question
- A GDC project identifier
- Network access to api.gdc.cancer.gov
- Per-field coverage table separating populated from informative values
- Assay coverage as a percentage of the cohort
- A yes/no verdict for six common analysis classes
- A chart contrasting populated with informative coverage, field by field
Steps
- Fetch project summary and per-assay case counts
- Request facet counts for the clinical fields that gate common analyses
- Separate absent fields from fields populated with non-answers
- Flag one-to-many fields where per-case percentages cannot be inferred
- Retrieve case-level fields and test whether a survival endpoint is derivable
- Print a verdict for each analysis class
Given a research goal, which dataset should an agent choose, and what must it refuse to do with it?
Select a dataset the way an agent should
- The CD2S structured export
- pandas
- Contrast between a size-ranked and a capability-ranked selection
- A transparent fit score favoring under-used resources
- Blocking limitations read before committing
- A machine-readable task brief for the next step
- A chart of the ranked fit scores with the selected cohort highlighted
Steps
- Load the structured index
- Show what a naive size-ranked selection returns
- Filter on measured capability rather than description
- Rank on fit, rewarding under-used datasets
- Read blocking limitations from the full record
- Emit a task brief including what the agent must not do
Start here
Starter code generated from this record’s own identifiers, then the access steps.
Get the data in code
GDC: list open files and download thempython
import json, requests
PROJECT = "MP2PRT-ALL"
filters = {"op": "and", "content": [
{"op": "in", "content": {"field": "cases.project.project_id", "value": [PROJECT]}},
{"op": "in", "content": {"field": "access", "value": ["open"]}},
]}
params = {"filters": json.dumps(filters),
"fields": "file_id,file_name,data_category,data_type,file_size",
"size": "10000", "format": "JSON"}
files = requests.get("https://api.gdc.cancer.gov/files", params=params, timeout=60).json()["data"]["hits"]
print(len(files), "open files")
# Write a manifest and fetch with the GDC client (https://gdc.cancer.gov/access-data/gdc-data-transfer-tool)
with open("manifest.txt", "w") as fh:
fh.write("id\n" + "\n".join(f["file_id"] for f in files))
# $ gdc-client download -m manifest.txtGDC: clinical table for every casepython
import json, requests
filters = {"op": "in", "content": {"field": "project.project_id", "value": ["MP2PRT-ALL"]}}
params = {"filters": json.dumps(filters), "size": "5000", "format": "TSV",
"fields": ",".join([
"submitter_id", "demographic.vital_status", "demographic.days_to_death",
"diagnoses.days_to_last_follow_up", "diagnoses.ajcc_pathologic_stage",
"diagnoses.treatments.treatment_type", "diagnoses.treatments.treatment_outcome"])}
tsv = requests.get("https://api.gdc.cancer.gov/cases", params=params, timeout=60).text
open("MP2PRT-ALL_clinical.tsv", "w").write(tsv)This page as data: limitations firstbash
curl -s https://cd2s.vercel.app/data/datasets/gdc-mp2prt-all.json | python3 -c '
import json, sys
r = json.load(sys.stdin)
for l in r["limitations"]:
print(l["severity"].upper(), "-", l["statement"][:120])
print("survival endpoint:", r["longitudinal"]["has_survival_endpoint"], "| treatment response:", r["longitudinal"]["has_treatment_response"])'Access steps
- Confirm which trial protocols the cohort draws fromFor people
The regimen field contains protocol arm names. Reading the corresponding COG protocol publications is what turns those strings into an interpretable treatment variable.
- Scope with the 7,459 open-access filesFor peoplehttps://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/projects/MP2PRT-ALL
- Submit a dbGaP data access requestFor peoplehttps://gdc.cancer.gov/access-data/obtaining-access-controlled-data
- Query the project from code, with no credentialsFor agents
The file index is public even where files are not, so an agent can size the cohort before anyone requests access.
https://docs.gdc.cancer.gov/API/Users_Guide/Getting_Started/curl -s 'https://api.gdc.cancer.gov/files' --get \ --data-urlencode 'filters={"op":"in","content":{"field":"cases.project.project_id","value":["MP2PRT-ALL"]}}' \ --data-urlencode 'fields=file_id,file_name,data_type' \ --data-urlencode 'size=10000' --data-urlencode 'format=TSV' - Pass the token when the agent needs controlled filesFor agents
Without a token, an API query may return only the open subset. Compare returned counts with the record before treating them as the whole cohort.
https://docs.gdc.cancer.gov/API/Users_Guide/Getting_Started/curl -H "X-Auth-Token: $GDC_TOKEN" https://api.gdc.cancer.gov/data/<file_id>
Provenance
All of it, and more, is in this record’s JSON.
Identifiers
- GDC projectMP2PRT-ALLAPI
- GDC programAPI
- dbGaP studyphs002005API
Versions and verification
- Released
- 1 Jan 2025
- Metadata retrieved
- 18 Sept 2026
- Review status
- Project-curatedCD2S project curation on 18 Sept 2026
- Data generation funding
- Funded data generation
- The machine-inferred primary publication for this cohort is not authoritative. The cohort derives from Children's Oncology Group trials; confirm the correct marker publication with the COG data team before citing one.
Funding
Funded reuse of these data
- R01CA264837Biomarkers of dasatinib response and resistance in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemiaDavid T. Teachey, Jun J. YangAPI
- R01CA273326Tracking Therapy-Resistant Alterations in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaXiaotu MaAPI
Funded infrastructure or harmonization
- U01CA264610Clonal Therapy for Pediatric T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaJun J. Yang, Jiyang YuAPI
- P30CA021765Cancer Biology (CBP)Douglas R. Green, Michael A DyerAPI
- U10CA180899Children's Oncology Group Statistics and Data CenterTODD A ALONZO, Meenakshi DevidasAPI
- U10CA180886COG NCTN Network Group Operations CenterDouglas S. Hawkins, Richard AplencAPI