Skip to content
Datasets/TCGA-HNSC

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

MixedMachine-extracted
TCGAAvailable from GDC and IDC

The Cancer Imaging Program (CIP) is working directly with primary investigators from institutes participating in TCGA to obtain and load images relating to the genomic, clinical, and pathological data being stored within the TCGA Data Portal. Currently this large PET/CT multi-sequence image collection of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC) patients can be matched by each unique case identifier with the extensive gene and expression data of the same case from The Cancer Genome Atlas Data Portal to research the link between clinical phenome and tissue genome. Please see the TCGA-HNSC page to learn more about the radiology images and to obtain any supporting metadata for this collection. Please see the DICOM converted Slide Microscopy images for the TCGA-HNSC collection page to learn more about the histopathology images and to obtain any supporting metadata for this collection.

Can it answer your research question?

6 of 6 supported
  • Overall survival

    Supported

    Vital status and time are populated; median follow-up 1.8 years; 527 cases with follow-up; endpoints: overall survival, progression-free interval.API

  • Progression or recurrence

    Supported

    A time to event is derivable: progression-free interval; progression_or_recurrence is informative for 26% of cases.API

  • Treatment response

    Supported

    disease_response is populated for 96% of cases; criteria: complete response, no measurable disease.API

  • Which drug was given

    Supported

    therapeutic_agents is recorded for 34% of cases.API

  • Stage-adjusted modelling

    Supported

    ajcc_clinical_stage is informative for 97% of cases.API

  • Analysis by race or ethnicity

    Supported

    Race is informative for 97% of cases.API

Judged from the repository’s own field completeness (thresholds). “Not measured” means we have not probed that field for this record, not that the data lack it.

At a glance

Every percentage is the repository’s own record of what is filled in
CasesAPI2
528
Measurement types
12
35,128 files, 276 TB
Follow-upAPI
21.2 months
for 527 of 528 cases; overall survival, progression-free interval
Treatment responseAPI
Recorded
complete response, no measurable disease, persistent disease

SubjectCALC

Head and neck

As filed by the repository

Squamous Cell NeoplasmsBase of tongueBones, joints and articular cartilage of other and unspecified sitesFloor of mouthGumHead-NeckHypopharynxLarynxLipOropharynxOther and ill-defined sites in lip, oral cavity and pharynxOther and unspecified parts of mouth

Who is in the cohortAPI

A usable value“Not reported” or “unknown”No value recorded
  • Sex386 male · 142 female
  • Race452 white · 48 black or african american · 11 asian · 2 1 other · 9 not reported · 6 unknown
  • Ethnicity465 not hispanic or latino · 26 hispanic or latino · 34 not reported · 3 unknown
  • Vital status304 alive · 224 dead

Age at diagnosis

Median 62, middle half 54–69, range 20–90 years across 527 cases.

What was measured, and on how many

12 measurement types, 2 covering the whole cohort.

  • DNA methylation array528 of 528 · 100%
  • Clinical528 of 528 · 100%
  • Whole exome sequencing527 of 528 · >99%
  • SNP genotyping array (copy number, germline)526 of 528 · >99%
  • microRNA sequencing524 of 528 · >99%
  • DICOM medical imaging523 of 528 · >99%
  • Bulk RNA sequencing521 of 528 · 99%
  • Whole-slide tissue images520 of 528 · 98%
  • Whole genome sequencing482 of 528 · 91%
  • Somatic Structural Variation433 of 528 · 82%
  • Reverse phase protein array354 of 528 · 67%
  • ATAC sequencing (chromatin accessibility)9 of 528 · 2%
Platform, files and data levels
AssayPlatformFilesLevels
DNA methylation arrayAPIillumina1,740-
ClinicalAPI2-1,103-
Whole exome sequencingAPIillumina8,264-
SNP genotyping array (copy number, germline)APIillumina6,989-
microRNA sequencingAPIillumina1,707-
DICOM medical imagingAPI--DICOM series
Bulk RNA sequencingAPIillumina5,094-
Whole-slide tissue imagesAPI2illumina791-
Whole genome sequencingAPI2illumina7,010-
Somatic Structural VariationAPI-1,555-
Reverse phase protein arrayAPIillumina354-
ATAC sequencing (chromatin accessibility)APIillumina9-
How complete all 29 clinical fields are - 19 informative for at least 80% of cases

A field counts as informative only when it holds a real value. “Not reported” blocks an analysis just as a missing field does. Fields marked 1:n can hold several records per case, so they show the share of cases with any record.

Informative - a usable valuePresent but uninformative - “not reported” or “unknown”Absent - no value recorded

Outcome

  • Vital statusAPI100%
  • Cause of deathAPI7%
  • Progression or recurrenceAPI0%
  • Last known disease statusAPI0%

Follow-up

  • Disease response at follow-up1:nAPI96%
  • Progression at follow-upAPI26%
  • ECOG performance statusAPI0%

Treatment

  • Prior treatment1:nAPI100%
  • Treatment type1:nAPI92%
  • Treatment given1:nAPI92%
  • Treatment outcome1:nAPI58%
  • Therapeutic agents1:nAPI34%
  • Regimen or line of therapyAPI<1%

Staging

  • AJCC clinical stageAPI97%
  • AJCC pathologic stageAPI86%

Diagnosis

  • Primary diagnosis1:nAPI100%
  • Tissue or organ of origin1:nAPI100%
  • Prior malignancyAPI100%
  • Synchronous malignancyAPI100%

Pathology

  • Morphology (ICD-O)1:nAPI100%
  • Classification of tumor1:nAPI100%
  • Tumor gradeAPI>99%

Demographics

  • Sex at birthAPI100%
  • RaceAPI97%
  • EthnicityAPI93%
  • Country of residenceAPI86%
  • Population groupAPI0%

Exposure

  • Tobacco smoking statusAPI98%
  • Alcohol historyAPI43%

Access

MixedSome components are open; others need approval.API

Data Access Request through dbGaP using an eRA Commons account; institutional signing official approval required

Open components
13,643 open-access files
Controlled components
21,485 controlled-access files
Typical turnaround
days to a few weeks after signing official approval
License
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy terms
Citation requirement
Cite the dataset accession and the program's publication guidelines; see the GDC publication policy.

What it is good for

Written and checked by a reviewer, not generated from metadata.

No reviewed research questions yet. The measurements and field completeness above are machine-extracted and still useful for judging fit.

What it cannot tell you

Written by a reviewer against the source, not inferred from what is missing.

No reviewed limitations yet. Check the field completeness chart above before committing to an analysis. Low coverage on an endpoint you need is the most common blocker.

Who has used it

Articles that analyzed these data, counted separately from articles that only cited the paper. Only the first counts as reuse.

Analyzed the dataCALC2
758
accession in the methods; 100% of a 30-article sample really cited it
Declared using it
95
named in a data availability statement
Cited the paper
3,314
attention to the publication, not reuse of the data
Against expectation
As expected or above
about 313 articles expected; index 1.27

What articles did with it

Only the last row counts as reuse. Where the accession appears in an article tells us what the authors did with the data.

  • Cited the paper3,314
  • Mentioned the dataset71
  • Accession found in text0
  • Declared using it95
  • Analyzed the data758

Against comparable datasets

758 articles analyzed these data. About 313 would be expected. The expectation comes from a model of size, age, breadth and access tier.

  • Analyzed it758
  • Expected~313
Reuse assessment
  • Reuse is within the expected range for comparable datasets (index +1.27).

Compared against 132 datasets in this corpus with a citable accession and sufficient metadata. See Methods for the model.

Articles that analyzed the data

Examples, not the full list. 112 articles matching this dataset's accession search were retrieved and graded individually; these are the strongest of those.

Deep-review sample: author overlap and funding were checked only for the 10 articles listed here, not for every article examined. Of the 10 that analyzed the data, 9 of the 10 we could check had no author in common with the generating team, and 0 of the 10 we could check were themselves NCI-funded. These are sample counts, not population estimates.

Community examples

Share your example

Analyses someone ran on these data end to end, each with a receipt recording when it ran, against which packages and for how long.

Nobody has shared an analysis of this dataset yet. The examples on other datasets cover the common patterns and can be adapted - and if you adapt one, it belongs here.

Start here

Starter code generated from this record’s own identifiers, then the access steps.

Get the data in code

GDC: list open files and download thempython

Open-access files need no account. Controlled files need an approved dbGaP request and a token passed to gdc-client.

import json, requests

PROJECT = "TCGA-HNSC"
filters = {"op": "and", "content": [
    {"op": "in", "content": {"field": "cases.project.project_id", "value": [PROJECT]}},
    {"op": "in", "content": {"field": "access", "value": ["open"]}},
]}
params = {"filters": json.dumps(filters),
          "fields": "file_id,file_name,data_category,data_type,file_size",
          "size": "10000", "format": "JSON"}
files = requests.get("https://api.gdc.cancer.gov/files", params=params, timeout=60).json()["data"]["hits"]
print(len(files), "open files")

# Write a manifest and fetch with the GDC client (https://gdc.cancer.gov/access-data/gdc-data-transfer-tool)
with open("manifest.txt", "w") as fh:
    fh.write("id\n" + "\n".join(f["file_id"] for f in files))
# $ gdc-client download -m manifest.txt
GDC: clinical table for every casepython
import json, requests

filters = {"op": "in", "content": {"field": "project.project_id", "value": ["TCGA-HNSC"]}}
params = {"filters": json.dumps(filters), "size": "5000", "format": "TSV",
          "fields": ",".join([
              "submitter_id", "demographic.vital_status", "demographic.days_to_death",
              "diagnoses.days_to_last_follow_up", "diagnoses.ajcc_pathologic_stage",
              "diagnoses.treatments.treatment_type", "diagnoses.treatments.treatment_outcome"])}
tsv = requests.get("https://api.gdc.cancer.gov/cases", params=params, timeout=60).text
open("TCGA-HNSC_clinical.tsv", "w").write(tsv)
IDC: pull the DICOM collection with idc-indexpython

pip install idc-index. Images are public; the package uses s5cmd under the hood.

from idc_index import IDCClient

COLLECTION = "tcga_hnsc"
client = IDCClient()

series = client.index[client.index["collection_id"] == COLLECTION]   # one row per DICOM series
print(len(series), "series,", series["PatientID"].nunique(), "patients,",
      round(series["series_size_MB"].sum() / 1024, 1), "GB")
print(series["Modality"].value_counts().to_dict())

# Everything above is an index lookup and costs nothing. Uncomment to pull the pixels;
# the client refuses up front if the disk cannot hold them.
# client.download_from_selection(collection_id=COLLECTION, downloadDir="./tcga_hnsc")
This page as data: limitations firstbash
curl -s https://cd2s.vercel.app/data/datasets/gdc-tcga-hnsc.json | python3 -c '
import json, sys
r = json.load(sys.stdin)
for l in r["limitations"]:
    print(l["severity"].upper(), "-", l["statement"][:120])
print("survival endpoint:", r["longitudinal"]["has_survival_endpoint"], "| treatment response:", r["longitudinal"]["has_treatment_response"])'

Access steps

  1. 1
    Open the project in the GDC Data PortalFor people5 minutes

    Check the portal's current case and file counts before requesting anything; the cohort can change after this record was built.

    https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/projects/TCGA-HNSC

    Generated from repository policy. Check the linked policy before downloading.

  2. 2
    Download the open files without an accountFor peopleminutes to hours, by cohort size

    13,643 open-access files are marked open access. Add them to a portal cart, export a manifest, and fetch it with the GDC Data Transfer Tool.

    gdc-client download -m gdc_manifest.txt
    https://gdc.cancer.gov/access-data/gdc-data-transfer-tool

    Generated from repository policy. Check the linked policy before downloading.

  3. 3
    Request controlled access through dbGaPFor peopledays to a few weeks after signing official approval

    21,485 controlled-access files require an approved data access request. The request starts at dbGaP, not in the portal. The relevant study is phs000178.

    Requires: eRA Commons account, institutional signing official approval, dbGaP data access request for phs000178

    https://gdc.cancer.gov/access-data/obtaining-access-controlled-data

    Generated from repository policy. Check the linked policy before downloading.

  4. 4
    Download controlled files with your tokenFor people

    An approved request yields a token. The same manifest fetches nothing controlled without it.

    Requires: approved dbGaP request, GDC authentication token

    gdc-client download -m gdc_manifest.txt -t gdc-user-token.txt
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgi-bin/study.cgi?study_id=phs000178

    Generated from repository policy. Check the linked policy before downloading.

  5. 5
    Query the project from code, with no credentialsFor agents

    The file index is public even where files are not, so an agent can size the cohort before anyone requests access.

    curl -s 'https://api.gdc.cancer.gov/files' --get \
      --data-urlencode 'filters={"op":"in","content":{"field":"cases.project.project_id","value":["TCGA-HNSC"]}}' \
      --data-urlencode 'fields=file_id,file_name,data_type' \
      --data-urlencode 'size=10000' --data-urlencode 'format=TSV'
    https://docs.gdc.cancer.gov/API/Users_Guide/Getting_Started/

    Generated from repository policy. Check the linked policy before downloading.

  6. 6
    Pass the token when the agent needs controlled filesFor agents

    Without a token, an API query may return only the open subset. Compare returned counts with the record before treating them as the whole cohort.

    Requires: GDC authentication token

    curl -H "X-Auth-Token: $GDC_TOKEN" https://api.gdc.cancer.gov/data/<file_id>
    https://docs.gdc.cancer.gov/API/Users_Guide/Getting_Started/

    Generated from repository policy. Check the linked policy before downloading.

Provenance

All of it, and more, is in this record’s JSON.

Identifiers

Versions and verification

Released
1 Jan 2013
Metadata retrieved
18 Sept 2026
Review status
Machine-extracted
Data generation funding
Funded data generation

Funding

Awards resolved through NIH RePORTER. Awards that paid to generate these data are listed apart from awards that paid to reuse them. Both are returns on NCI investment, but different ones.

Funded data generation

  • U24CA180951Cloud Based Resource for Data Hosting, Visualization and Analysis Using UCSC CancDAVID H HAUSSLERFY2013-2017API
  • U24CA144025Harvard Genome Characterization CenterRaju S. KucherlapatiFY2009-2016API
  • U24CA143883Integrative Pipeline for Analysis & Translational Application of TCGA Data (GDAC)Rehan Akbani, GORDON B. MILLSFY2009-2016API
  • U24CA143882The USC-JHU Cancer Epigenome Characterization CenterSTEPHEN B. BAYLIN, Daniel Joseph WeisenbergerFY2009-2016API
  • U24CA143867Genome Characterization Center (GCC)Stacey Gabriel, Matthew L. MeyersonFY2009-2016API
  • U24CA143866Cancer transcriptome characterization using massively parallel DNA sequencingMarco Antonio MarraFY2009-2015API
  • U24CA143858UCSC-Buck Inst. Genome Data Analysis Center for TCGA Research Network (GDAC)Christopher Benz, DAVID H HAUSSLERFY2009-2016API
  • U24CA143848Gene Expression Patterns in Human Tumors Identified Using Transcript SequencingDavid N Hayes, CHARLES M PEROUFY2009-2016API
  • U24CA143845The Cancer Genome Atlas Data Analysis CenterLYNDA CHIN, GAD A GETZFY2009-2016API
  • U24CA143843The BCM Tumor Genome Characterization CenterRICHARD A GIBBS, David Andrew WheelerFY2009-2013API

and 8 more

For softwarerecord JSON