Skip to content
Datasets/ORGANOID-PANCREATIC

Pancreas Cancer Organoid Profiling

MixedProject-curated
ORGANOIDAvailable from GDC

70 patient-derived pancreatic cancer organoids with exome and RNA sequencing, linked to drug-response profiling in the source publication - a living model resource rather than a tissue archive.

Can it answer your research question?

2 of 6 supported
  • Overall survival

    Not supported

    Vital status is recorded for every case and informative for none.API

  • Progression or recurrence

    Not supported

    progression_or_recurrence is informative for no case in the harmonized records.API

  • Treatment response

    Not supported

    treatment_outcome is populated for no case in the harmonized records.API

  • Which drug was given

    Not supported

    therapeutic_agents is recorded for no case in the harmonized records.API

  • Stage-adjusted modelling

    Supported

    ajcc_pathologic_stage is informative for 80% of cases.API

  • Analysis by race or ethnicity

    Supported

    Ethnicity is informative for 97% of cases.API

Judged from the repository’s own field completeness (thresholds). “Not measured” means we have not probed that field for this record, not that the data lack it.

At a glance

Every percentage is the repository’s own record of what is filled in
CasesAPI
70
Measurement types
4
966 files, 20 TB
Follow-upAPI
None recorded
no survival endpoint
Treatment responseAPI
Not recorded

SubjectCALC

Pancreas

As filed by the repository

UnknownAdenomas and AdenocarcinomasPancreas

Who is in the cohortAPI

A usable value“Not reported” or “unknown”No value recorded
  • Sex40 male · 29 female · 1 unknown
  • Race54 white · 6 black or african american · 2 asian · 8 not reported
  • Ethnicity62 not hispanic or latino · 6 hispanic or latino · 2 not reported
  • Vital status70 not reported

What was measured, and on how many

4 measurement types, none covering the whole cohort.

  • Whole exome sequencing69 of 70 · 99%
  • Bulk RNA sequencing49 of 70 · 70%
  • Whole genome sequencing22 of 70 · 31%
  • Structural Variation49 of 70 · 70%
Platform, files and data levels
AssayPlatformFilesLevels
Whole exome sequencingAPIillumina344-
Bulk RNA sequencingAPIillumina495-
Whole genome sequencingAPIillumina127-
Structural VariationAPI-220-
How complete all 29 clinical fields are - 7 informative for at least 80% of cases

A field counts as informative only when it holds a real value. “Not reported” blocks an analysis just as a missing field does. Fields marked 1:n can hold several records per case, so they show the share of cases with any record.

Informative - a usable valuePresent but uninformative - “not reported” or “unknown”Absent - no value recorded

Outcome

  • Last known disease statusAPI100%
  • Vital statusAPI0%
  • Cause of deathAPI0%
  • Progression or recurrenceAPI0%

Follow-up

  • Disease response at follow-upAPI0%
  • Progression at follow-upAPI0%
  • ECOG performance statusAPI0%

Treatment

  • Prior treatmentAPI0%
  • Treatment typeAPI0%
  • Treatment givenAPI0%
  • Therapeutic agentsAPI0%
  • Treatment outcomeAPI0%
  • Regimen or line of therapyAPI0%

Staging

  • AJCC pathologic stageAPI80%
  • AJCC clinical stageAPI0%

Diagnosis

  • Tissue or organ of originAPI100%
  • Primary diagnosisAPI84%
  • Prior malignancyAPI0%
  • Synchronous malignancyAPI0%

Pathology

  • Morphology (ICD-O)API0%
  • Tumor gradeAPI0%
  • Classification of tumorAPI0%

Demographics

  • Sex at birthAPI99%
  • EthnicityAPI97%
  • RaceAPI89%
  • Population groupAPI0%
  • Country of residenceAPI0%

Exposure

  • Tobacco smoking statusAPI0%
  • Alcohol historyAPI0%

Access

MixedSome components are open; others need approval.

Data Access Request through dbGaP using an eRA Commons account; institutional signing official approval required

Open components
55 open-access files
Controlled components
911 controlled-access files
Typical turnaround
days to a few weeks after signing official approval
License
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy terms
Citation requirement
Cite the dataset accession and the program's publication guidelines; see the GDC publication policy.

What it is good for

Written and checked by a reviewer, not generated from metadata.

  1. 1. Which molecular features predict chemotherapy sensitivity in pancreatic cancer organoids?

    Needs another datasetn ≈ 49HUMAN

    Exome on 69 and expression on 49 organoids, with measured drug responses reported in the source publication. Because response is measured experimentally rather than inferred from clinical records, this avoids the treatment confounding that defeats observational response analysis.

    Statistical note: Pharmacotyping data are in the publication's supplementary material, not in the GDC record. Retrieve and join them before designing the analysis.

    NeedsWhole exome sequencingBulk RNA sequencing

    A published example: PMID 29853643

  2. 2. How faithfully do organoids recapitulate the genomics of the tumors they came from?

    Needs approved accessn ≈ 69HUMAN

    A model-fidelity question that determines how much weight any organoid result deserves, and one that can be posed here because both the organoid profiles and the source tumor stage information are available.

    Statistical note: Matched primary tumor sequencing is not uniformly available in this record; check pairing before assuming it.

    NeedsWhole exome sequencingWhole genome sequencing
  3. 3. Can organoid expression programs stratify pancreatic cancer subtypes established in tissue cohorts?

    Needs approved accessn ≈ 49HUMAN

    Expression on 49 organoids can be scored against the basal-like and classical subtype definitions derived from bulk tumor cohorts, testing whether those subtypes survive in culture.

    Statistical note: Culture adaptation shifts expression; divergence from tissue subtypes is a finding about the model system as much as about the tumor.

    NeedsBulk RNA sequencing

What it cannot tell you

1 blocking

Written by a reviewer against the source, not inferred from what is missing.

BlockingMissing dataHUMAN

Vital status is populated for all 70 cases and informative for none, and progression is likewise uninformative. No clinical outcome endpoint exists in these records.

Affects: Survival analysis; Clinical outcome correlation

Mitigation: Use the measured organoid drug response as the endpoint instead, obtained from the source publication.

MajorTreatment contextHUMAN

No treatment fields are populated, so the clinical therapy each donor received is unknown, and prior treatment could affect the derived organoid.

Affects: Interpreting organoid response in clinical context

Mitigation: Consult the source publication for treatment history.

MajorStatistical powerHUMAN

70 organoids with 49 expression profiles limits discovery power sharply.

Affects: Genome-wide association with drug response

Mitigation: Pre-specify candidate genes or pathways.

MajorAnnotation qualityHUMAN

Organoids are a model system. Findings describe cultured cells derived from patients, not the patients themselves, and culture selects for growth-competent clones.

Affects: Any direct clinical inference

Mitigation: State the model-system caveat in any translational claim.

MajorAccess constraintHUMAN

911 of 966 files are controlled access.

Affects: Sequence-level analysis

Mitigation: Submit a dbGaP request.

Not appropriate for

  • Survival or prognostic analysis. - Vital status is uninformative for all 70 cases.HUMAN
  • Claiming clinical efficacy from organoid drug response. - Organoid sensitivity is a model-system measurement; the link to patient benefit requires clinical validation this resource does not contain.HUMAN

Who has used it

Articles that analyzed these data, counted separately from articles that only cited the paper. Only the first counts as reuse.

Analyzed the dataCALC2
3
accession in the methods section
Declared using it
2
named in a data availability statement
Cited the paper
898
attention to the publication, not reuse of the data
Against expectation
Somewhat below
about 3 articles expected; index -0.00

What articles did with it

Only the last row counts as reuse. Where the accession appears in an article tells us what the authors did with the data.

  • Cited the paper898
  • Mentioned the dataset0
  • Accession found in text4
  • Declared using it2
  • Analyzed the data3

Against comparable datasets

3 articles analyzed these data. About 3 would be expected. The expectation comes from a model of size, age, breadth and access tier.

  • Analyzed it3
  • Expected~3
Well known, little used
The publication has 898 citations, about 299 for every article that analyzed the data. The finding travelled further than the resource did.
More articles are listed below than the count
The headline count is deliberately narrow: one section of one accession (METHODS:"phs001611"), so every dataset in the corpus is counted the same way and the numbers can be compared. The 10 articles listed below were retrieved and graded one at a time, and an article counts as having analyzed the data wherever the accession sits in the analysis - methods, results, tables, figures or supplement - under any of this dataset’s accessions. Read the list as the evidence about these articles, and the count as the number that is comparable across datasets.
Reuse assessment
  • Reuse is within the expected range for comparable datasets (index -0.00).

Compared against 132 datasets in this corpus with a citable accession and sufficient metadata. See Methods for the model.

Original publication

Articles that analyzed the data

Examples, not the full list. 22 articles matching this dataset's accession search were retrieved and graded individually; these are the strongest of those.

Deep-review sample: author overlap and funding were checked only for the 10 articles listed here, not for every article examined. Of the 10 that analyzed the data, 10 of the 10 we could check had no author in common with the generating team, and 4 of the 10 we could check were themselves NCI-funded. These are sample counts, not population estimates.

Community examples

Share your example

Analyses someone ran on these data end to end, each with a receipt recording when it ran, against which packages and for how long.

Nobody has shared an analysis of this dataset yet. The examples on other datasets cover the common patterns and can be adapted - and if you adapt one, it belongs here.

Start here

Starter code generated from this record’s own identifiers, then the access steps.

Get the data in code

GDC: list open files and download thempython

Open-access files need no account. Controlled files need an approved dbGaP request and a token passed to gdc-client.

import json, requests

PROJECT = "ORGANOID-PANCREATIC"
filters = {"op": "and", "content": [
    {"op": "in", "content": {"field": "cases.project.project_id", "value": [PROJECT]}},
    {"op": "in", "content": {"field": "access", "value": ["open"]}},
]}
params = {"filters": json.dumps(filters),
          "fields": "file_id,file_name,data_category,data_type,file_size",
          "size": "10000", "format": "JSON"}
files = requests.get("https://api.gdc.cancer.gov/files", params=params, timeout=60).json()["data"]["hits"]
print(len(files), "open files")

# Write a manifest and fetch with the GDC client (https://gdc.cancer.gov/access-data/gdc-data-transfer-tool)
with open("manifest.txt", "w") as fh:
    fh.write("id\n" + "\n".join(f["file_id"] for f in files))
# $ gdc-client download -m manifest.txt
GDC: clinical table for every casepython
import json, requests

filters = {"op": "in", "content": {"field": "project.project_id", "value": ["ORGANOID-PANCREATIC"]}}
params = {"filters": json.dumps(filters), "size": "5000", "format": "TSV",
          "fields": ",".join([
              "submitter_id", "demographic.vital_status", "demographic.days_to_death",
              "diagnoses.days_to_last_follow_up", "diagnoses.ajcc_pathologic_stage",
              "diagnoses.treatments.treatment_type", "diagnoses.treatments.treatment_outcome"])}
tsv = requests.get("https://api.gdc.cancer.gov/cases", params=params, timeout=60).text
open("ORGANOID-PANCREATIC_clinical.tsv", "w").write(tsv)
This page as data: limitations firstbash
curl -s https://cd2s.vercel.app/data/datasets/gdc-organoid-pancreatic.json | python3 -c '
import json, sys
r = json.load(sys.stdin)
for l in r["limitations"]:
    print(l["severity"].upper(), "-", l["statement"][:120])
print("survival endpoint:", r["longitudinal"]["has_survival_endpoint"], "| treatment response:", r["longitudinal"]["has_treatment_response"])'

Access steps

  1. 1
    Read the Cancer Discovery paper and retrieve its pharmacotyping supplementFor people2 hours

    The drug-response data are the reason to use this resource and they live in the paper, not the repository.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29853643/
  2. 2
    Scope with the 55 open-access filesFor people30 minutes
    https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/projects/ORGANOID-PANCREATIC
  3. 3
    Submit a dbGaP data access request for the sequence dataFor peopledays to a few weeks

    Requires: eRA Commons account, institutional signing official approval

    https://gdc.cancer.gov/access-data/obtaining-access-controlled-data
  4. 4
    Query the project from code, with no credentialsFor agents

    The file index is public even where files are not, so an agent can size the cohort before anyone requests access.

    curl -s 'https://api.gdc.cancer.gov/files' --get \
      --data-urlencode 'filters={"op":"in","content":{"field":"cases.project.project_id","value":["ORGANOID-PANCREATIC"]}}' \
      --data-urlencode 'fields=file_id,file_name,data_type' \
      --data-urlencode 'size=10000' --data-urlencode 'format=TSV'
    https://docs.gdc.cancer.gov/API/Users_Guide/Getting_Started/

    Generated from repository policy. Check the linked policy before downloading.

  5. 5
    Pass the token when the agent needs controlled filesFor agents

    Without a token, an API query may return only the open subset. Compare returned counts with the record before treating them as the whole cohort.

    Requires: GDC authentication token

    curl -H "X-Auth-Token: $GDC_TOKEN" https://api.gdc.cancer.gov/data/<file_id>
    https://docs.gdc.cancer.gov/API/Users_Guide/Getting_Started/

    Generated from repository policy. Check the linked policy before downloading.

Provenance

All of it, and more, is in this record’s JSON.

Identifiers

Versions and verification

Released
1 Jan 2022
Metadata retrieved
18 Sept 2026
Review status
Project-curatedCD2S project curation on 18 Sept 2026
Data generation funding
Funded data generation

Funding

Awards resolved through NIH RePORTER. Awards that paid to generate these data are listed apart from awards that paid to reuse them. Both are returns on NCI investment, but different ones.

Funded data generation

  • U10CA180944Integrated Translational Cancer Science CenterLAURENCE HOWARD BAKER, Edison Tak-Bun LiuFY2014-2018API2
  • U01CA224013CSHL-JAX Patient-Derived Models of Pancreatic Cancer as Systems for Investigating Tumor HeterogeneityPaul Robson, David A TuvesonFY2018-2022API2
  • U01CA210240Pancreatic Cancer Detection ConsortiumMichael A. HollingsworthFY2017-2026API2
  • U01CA168409COMPUTATIONAL AND FUNCTIONAL APPROACHES TO VALIDATING CANCER GENOME TARGETSScott PowersFY2012-2016API2
  • T32CA148056CSHL Cancer Gene Discovery and Cancer Biology Postdoctoral Research Training ProgramLloyd C Trotman, Alea A. MillsFY2011-2020API2
  • R50CA211462Critical Resources Provided by UNMC Rapid Autopsy Program (RAP) Biorepository Stimulate Cancer ResearchPaul M GrandgenettFY2016-2026API2
  • R01CA212600Targeting HuR to improve a synthetic lethal therapy for pancreatic cancerJonathan BrodyFY2017-2021API2
  • R01CA202762Pharmacogenomic and circulating tumor cell approach to individualized treatment of pancreatic cancerBrian J. McCarthy, Kenneth H. YuFY2016-2020API2
  • R01CA190092(PQA-4) Organoid Omics To Detect And Defeat Ductal Pancreatic CancerDavid A TuvesonFY2014-2017API2
  • R01CA188134Nrf2 Regulation of Ductal Pancreatic Cancer Etiology and Treatment ResponseDavid A TuvesonFY2017-2021API2

and 3 more

Funded reuse of these data

  • R01CA255670Mechanistic investigations of microbiome-driven aryl hydrocarbon receptor activity and macrophage function in pancreatic cancer.Tracy L McGahaFY2021-2025API
  • R01CA190449The role of marginal zone macrophages and immuno-metabolism in tumor-driven MDSC developmentTracy L McGahaFY2015-2020API
  • R50CA211506Preclinical Models for Cancer Therapeutic DevelopmentYOUNGKYU PARKFY2016-2025API
  • R35CA197745Predicting Cancer Cell Response to Endogenous and Exogenous Perturbations at the Single Cell LevelANDREA CALIFANOFY2015-2026API
  • R33CA206949Advanced Development and Validation of 3 Dimensional Spheroid Culture of Primary Cancer Cells using Nano3D TechnologyTimothy Patrick SpicerFY2016-2019API
  • R01CA281198Collagen Signaling in Pancreatic CancerJean-Philippe Francois Marie Coppe, Howard C. CrawfordFY2024-2026API
  • R01CA248160Stromal metabolism promotes therapeutic resistance in pancreatic cancerCostas Andreas LyssiotisFY2020-2024API
  • R01CA247516Metaplastic Tuft Cells in Pancreatic CancerHoward C. CrawfordFY2020-2024API
  • R01CA244931Targeting metabolic stress to induce pancreatic tumor cell deathCostas Andreas LyssiotisFY2020-2024API
  • R01CA198074Dosage-Dependent Hedgehog Signaling in Pancreatic CancerBenjamin Allen, Marina Pasca Di MaglianoFY2015-2019API

and 13 more

Funded infrastructure or harmonization

  • P30CA010815Research Program: Molecular and Cellular OncogenesisMaureen E. Murphy, Luis J MontanerFY1985-2026API
  • U54CA209997Structural and Functional Biology-based analysis of non-oncogene cancer dependenciesANDREA CALIFANO, BARRY H HONIGFY2016-2021API
  • U01CA274154Fibroblast orchestration of the immune response in pancreatic cancerHoward C. Crawford, Timothy Louis FrankelFY2022-2026API
  • U01CA224145Interrupting Cellular Crosstalk in the Immunosuppressive Microenvironment of Pancreas CancerHoward C. Crawford, Marina Pasca Di MaglianoFY2017-2021API
  • U01CA200468Clinical Validation Center for Early Detection of Pancreatic CancerANIRBAN MAITRAFY2016-2026API
  • P50CA101955UAB / UMN SPORE in Pancreatic CancerDonald J Buchsbaum, David Terry CurielFY2010-2014API
  • P30CA046592Cancer Center AdministrationEric R. Fearon, KATHLEEN R. CHOFY1988-2026API
  • P30CA045508Cancer Research Training and Education Coordination CoreLloyd C Trotman, NICHOLAS K TONKSFY1987-2026API
  • P30CA034196Cancer Center Support (CORE) GrantAnna Karolina Palucka, William Carl SkarnesFY1985-2026API
  • P30CA013696Developmental FundsAnil K Rustgi, Andrew B LassmanFY1985-2026API

and 4 more

For softwarerecord JSON