Funding in, findings out
For any dataset: the NCI award that paid to create it, and the awards that got a published finding out of it afterwards.
TCGA-OV
Ovarian Serous Cystadenocarcinoma
21 awards paid to create it · 0 awards funded work that used it
1. Awards that paid to create this data (6 of 21)
- Personalized Vaccines Targeting Cryptic Antigens in Ovarian Cancer · Marion Curtis, Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez · FY2009–2026
- ADA3: a novel target for HPV16 E6 oncoprotein · VIMLA BAND · FY2002–2006
- Exploiting Biological Networks to Improve Clinical Treatment of Ovarian Cancer · ANDREW K. GODWIN · FY2010–2014
- Tools for Large-Scale Analysis of Driver Pathways · Rachel Karchin · FY2008–2009
- The TCGA Cancer Genome Characterization Center at MSKCC · Marc Ladanyi · FY2006–2009
- Cancer Genome Characterization using Gene Expression and DNA Copy Number Analys… · CHARLES M PEROU · FY2006–2009
The best connected are shown.
2. The dataset
3. Articles that used it
4. Awards those articles were funded by
Why one side of this chain is empty
- 10 of the articles using this dataset were retrieved and checked against RePORTER, and none of them reports an NCI award.
Awards that paid to create this data
Credited on the dataset's own marker paper.
| Award | Project | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| P50CA136393 P50FY2009–2026$68.7M | Personalized Vaccines Targeting Cryptic Antigens in Ovarian Cancer | API |
| R01CA094143 R01FY2002–2006$1.7M | ADA3: a novel target for HPV16 E6 oncoprotein | API |
| R01CA140323 R01FY2010–2014$2.1M | Exploiting Biological Networks to Improve Clinical Treatment of Ovarian Cancer | API |
| R21CA135877 R21FY2008–2009$406k | Tools for Large-Scale Analysis of Driver Pathways | API |
| U24CA126543 U24FY2006–2009$5.1M | The TCGA Cancer Genome Characterization Center at MSKCC | API |
| U24CA126544 U24FY2006–2009$4.9M | Cancer Genome Characterization using Gene Expression and DNA Copy Number Analysis | API |
| U24CA126546 U24FY2006–2009$7.7M | Center for Cancer Genome Characterization | API |
| U24CA126551 U24FY2006–2009$5.4M | The Berkeley Cancer Genome Center | API |
| U24CA126554 U24FY2006–2009$6.1M | Cancer Genomics Center | API |
| U24CA126561 U24FY2006–2009$2.8M | Cancer Genome Characterization Center at Johns Hopkins | API |
| U24CA126563 U24FY2006–2009$5.6M | HudsonAlpha Cancer Genome Characterization Center | API |
| U24CA143835 U24FY2009–2016$10.6M | Center for Systems Analysis of the Cancer Regulome | API |
| U24CA143840 U24FY2009–2016$11.5M | MSKCC Center for Translational Cancer Genomic Analysis | API |
| U24CA143843 U24FY2009–2013$9.5M | The BCM Tumor Genome Characterization Center | API |
| U24CA143845 U24FY2009–2016$16.0M | The Cancer Genome Atlas Data Analysis Center | API |
| U24CA143848 U24FY2009–2016$20.8M | Gene Expression Patterns in Human Tumors Identified Using Transcript Sequencing | API |
| U24CA143858 U24FY2009–2016$8.9M | UCSC-Buck Inst. Genome Data Analysis Center for TCGA Research Network (GDAC) | API |
| U24CA143866 U24FY2009–2015$10.9M | Cancer transcriptome characterization using massively parallel DNA sequencing | API |
| U24CA143867 U24FY2009–2016$17.0M | Genome Characterization Center (GCC) | API |
| U24CA143882 U24FY2009–2016$13.3M | The USC-JHU Cancer Epigenome Characterization Center | API |
| U24CA144025 U24FY2009–2016$14.0M | Harvard Genome Characterization Center | API |
Where the links come from
NIH RePORTER maps a PMID to the awards that reported it. On a dataset’s marker paper that gives the awards which created it; on an article that used the data, the awards which funded that use.
The two sides are not measured alike. Generation is complete: a dataset has one marker paper and every award on it is resolved. Reuse is a sample - the articles using a dataset can number in the thousands, and only the few dozen strongest are retrieved and looked up. Every award shown here funded reuse; there are more that are not shown.
How far it reaches
283 datasets have an award credited with creating them, 80 with using them, and 31 both.
What is missing
No citable accession means no traceable articles; no authoritative marker paper means no attributable generation award. Absence is a gap in the record. Methods.
Start from an award instead, and see every dataset it touches.