Funding in, findings out
For any dataset: the NCI award that paid to create it, and the awards that got a published finding out of it afterwards.
TCGA-KICH
Kidney Chromophobe
9 awards paid to create it · 3 awards funded work that used it
1. Awards that paid to create this data (6 of 9)
- DF/HCC Kidney Cancer Project 2: Optimizing Anti-PD1 Based Therapy in High Risk… · Arlene H. Sharpe, WILLIAM G. KAELIN · FY2003–2026
- Statistical methods for genomic analysis of heterogeneous tumors · Wenyi Wang · FY2014–2018
- The BCM Tumor Genome Characterization Center · RICHARD A GIBBS, David Andrew Wheeler · FY2009–2013
- Gene Expression Patterns in Human Tumors Identified Using Transcript Sequencing · David N Hayes, CHARLES M PEROU · FY2009–2016
- UCSC-Buck Inst. Genome Data Analysis Center for TCGA Research Network (GDAC) · Christopher Benz, DAVID H HAUSSLER · FY2009–2016
- Cancer transcriptome characterization using massively parallel DNA sequencing · Marco Antonio Marra · FY2009–2015
The best connected are shown.
2. The dataset
3. Articles that used it (2)
4. Awards those articles were funded by (3)
- Cancer Center Support Grant · PETER W PISTERS, FUNDA MERIC-BERNSTAM · FY1985–2025funded 1 of these 2 articles
- Gasdermin E and pyroptosis in cancer · Judy Lieberman · FY2020–2024funded 1 of these 2 articles
- Antitumor Assessment · Elisa de Stanchina, FRANCESCA M GANY · FY1985–2026funded 1 of these 2 articles
Awards that paid to create this data
Credited on the dataset's own marker paper.
| Award | Project | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| P50CA101942 P50FY2003–2026$83.6M | DF/HCC Kidney Cancer Project 2: Optimizing Anti-PD1 Based Therapy in High Risk and Metastatic RCC | API |
| R01CA183793 R01FY2014–2018$1.7M | Statistical methods for genomic analysis of heterogeneous tumors | API |
| U24CA143843 U24FY2009–2013$9.5M | The BCM Tumor Genome Characterization Center | API |
| U24CA143848 U24FY2009–2016$20.8M | Gene Expression Patterns in Human Tumors Identified Using Transcript Sequencing | API |
| U24CA143858 U24FY2009–2016$8.9M | UCSC-Buck Inst. Genome Data Analysis Center for TCGA Research Network (GDAC) | API |
| U24CA143866 U24FY2009–2015$10.9M | Cancer transcriptome characterization using massively parallel DNA sequencing | API |
| U24CA143867 U24FY2009–2016$17.0M | Genome Characterization Center (GCC) | API |
| U24CA143882 U24FY2009–2016$13.3M | The USC-JHU Cancer Epigenome Characterization Center | API |
| U24CA180951 U24FY2013–2017$2.9M | Cloud Based Resource for Data Hosting, Visualization and Analysis Using UCSC Canc | API |
Awards that funded work using this data
2 of 10 traced articles report an NCI award.
| Award | Project | Articles it is credited on | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| P30CA016672 P30FY1985–2025$531.0M | Cancer Center Support Grant | API | |
| R01CA240955 R01FY2020–2024$2.5M | Gasdermin E and pyroptosis in cancer | API | |
| P30CA008748 P30FY1985–2026$717.2M | Antitumor Assessment | API |
Awards that maintain or redistribute this data
Resource and center grants credited on articles that used the data. Kept out of the flow above because they pay for the pipes, not for a cohort or a finding.
| Award | Project | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| P30CA008748 P30FY1985–2026$717.2M | Antitumor Assessment | API |
| P30CA016672 P30FY1985–2025$531.0M | Cancer Center Support Grant | API |
Where the links come from
NIH RePORTER maps a PMID to the awards that reported it. On a dataset’s marker paper that gives the awards which created it; on an article that used the data, the awards which funded that use.
The two sides are not measured alike. Generation is complete: a dataset has one marker paper and every award on it is resolved. Reuse is a sample - the articles using a dataset can number in the thousands, and only the few dozen strongest are retrieved and looked up. Every award shown here funded reuse; there are more that are not shown.
How far it reaches
283 datasets have an award credited with creating them, 80 with using them, and 31 both.
What is missing
No citable accession means no traceable articles; no authoritative marker paper means no attributable generation award. Absence is a gap in the record. Methods.
Start from an award instead, and see every dataset it touches.