Funding in, findings out
For any dataset: the NCI award that paid to create it, and the awards that got a published finding out of it afterwards.
ntrk_msk_2019
Tumors with TRK fusions (MSK, Clin Cancer Res 2020)
6 awards paid to create it · 0 awards funded work that used it
1. Awards that paid to create this data (6)
- Antitumor Assessment · Elisa de Stanchina, FRANCESCA M GANY · FY2025–2026
- Understanding tumor addiction to TRK fusions and sensitivity to TRK inhibition · Alexander Drilon, Andrea Ventura · FY2018–2021
- Summer research experiences for medical students supervised by faculty mentors · Charlotte Eielson Ariyan, Jedd D. Wolchok · FY1985–2026
- Investigational Cancer Therapeutics Training Program (ICTTP) · Omar Abdel-Wahab, Alexander Drilon · FY1985–2026
- Clinical Scholars Biomedical Research Training Program · Ping Chi, THOMAS J. KELLY · FY1996–2026
- Translational Research in Oncology Training Program · CHARLES L. SAWYERS · FY2011–2020
2. The dataset
3. Articles that used it
4. Awards those articles were funded by
Why one side of this chain is empty
- This dataset has no accession that articles quote, so no reuse can be traced and nothing it enabled is visible.
Awards that paid to create this data
Credited on the dataset's own marker paper.
| Award | Project | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| P30CA008748 P30FY2025–2026$48.4M | Antitumor Assessment | API |
| R01CA226864 R01FY2018–2021$2.5M | Understanding tumor addiction to TRK fusions and sensitivity to TRK inhibition | API |
| R25CA020449 R25FY1985–2026$7.0M | Summer research experiences for medical students supervised by faculty mentors | API |
| T32CA009207 T32FY1985–2026$20.1M | Investigational Cancer Therapeutics Training Program (ICTTP) | API |
| T32CA009512 T32FY1996–2026$7.2M | Clinical Scholars Biomedical Research Training Program | API |
| T32CA160001 T32FY2011–2020$2.0M | Translational Research in Oncology Training Program | API |
Where the links come from
NIH RePORTER maps a PMID to the awards that reported it. On a dataset’s marker paper that gives the awards which created it; on an article that used the data, the awards which funded that use.
The two sides are not measured alike. Generation is complete: a dataset has one marker paper and every award on it is resolved. Reuse is a sample - the articles using a dataset can number in the thousands, and only the few dozen strongest are retrieved and looked up. Every award shown here funded reuse; there are more that are not shown.
How far it reaches
283 datasets have an award credited with creating them, 80 with using them, and 31 both.
What is missing
No citable accession means no traceable articles; no authoritative marker paper means no attributable generation award. Absence is a gap in the record. Methods.
Start from an award instead, and see every dataset it touches.