NSCLC Radiogenomics
211 non-small cell lung cancers with pre-surgical CT and PET/CT, semantic annotations, segmentations and matched gene expression - a genuinely paired imaging-genomics cohort, fully open, and described only in prose.
Can it answer your research question?
0 of 6 supportedOverall survival
Not measuredClinical field completeness has not been measured for this record.
Progression or recurrence
Not measuredClinical field completeness has not been measured for this record.
Treatment response
Not measuredClinical field completeness has not been measured for this record.
Which drug was given
Not measuredClinical field completeness has not been measured for this record.
Stage-adjusted modelling
Not measuredClinical field completeness has not been measured for this record.
Analysis by race or ethnicity
Not measuredClinical field completeness has not been measured for this record.
At a glance
Every percentage is the repository’s own record of what is filled inSubjectCALC
As filed by the repository
Who is in the cohort
The repository’s harmonized records carry no demographics for this dataset.
What was measured, and on how many
- DICOM medical imaging211 of 211 · 100%
- Clinical (accompanying data, per IDC supporting_data)
- Genomics (accompanying data, per IDC supporting_data)
Access
Public DICOM download from the IDC portal, its API, or the idc-index Python package; no account required for public collections.
- License
- Per-collection license, typically CC BY 3.0/4.0 or CC BY-NC
- Citation requirement
- Cite the collection DOI and the IDC/TCIA data-citation guidance.
What it is good for
Written and checked by a reviewer, not generated from metadata.
1. Do quantitative CT or PET features predict gene expression programs in lung adenocarcinoma?
Needs another datasetn ≈ 26HUMANThis is the defining radiogenomics question and it needs paired data on the same patients, which this collection provides for the subset with matched microarrays. Imaging is available for all 211.
Statistical note: The matched-expression subset described in the collection is around 26 patients, which supports hypothesis generation and feature-level correlation but not a validated predictive model. Confirm the exact overlap before designing.
NeedsRadiology imagingBulk RNA sequencing2. How reproducible are radiomic features across CT and PET acquisitions of the same tumor?
Answerable as shippedn ≈ 211HUMANBoth modalities were acquired for the same patients pre-surgically, so feature stability across modality and acquisition can be assessed directly - a prerequisite for any radiomics claim and rarely testable.
Statistical note: Reproducibility is estimable at this sample size; report intraclass correlation.
NeedsRadiology imaging3. Can models trained on this cohort's segmentations generalize to other lung imaging collections in the same repository?
Needs another datasetn ≈ 211HUMANExpert segmentations and semantic annotations are provided, and the Imaging Data Commons holds several other lung collections that can serve as external validation within one access framework.
NeedsRadiology imaging
What it cannot tell you
Written by a reviewer against the source, not inferred from what is missing.
The matched imaging-and-expression subset is a small fraction of the 211 imaged patients - the collection describes roughly 26 cases with microarray data. The cohort is imaging-rich and genomics-poor.
Affects: Predictive radiogenomic modeling; Genome-wide imaging-expression association
Mitigation: Treat radiogenomic analyses as hypothesis-generating and validate elsewhere. Use the full 211 for imaging-only questions.
The link between imaging and expression is documented in free text in the collection description rather than as a structured cross-reference, and depends on DICOM patient names matching microarray sample names.
Affects: Any paired analysis
Mitigation: Verify the join on a handful of cases before building on it, and report how many patients actually matched.
The matched expression data are microarray, not RNA sequencing, which constrains integration with contemporary transcriptomic cohorts.
Affects: Cross-cohort expression integration
Mitigation: Restrict to genes measurable on both platforms; use rank-based methods.
Outcome and treatment annotation are not distributed through the imaging repository metadata, so survival questions require the source publication's supplementary data.
Affects: Prognostic imaging models
Mitigation: Retrieve clinical variables from the Scientific Data paper's supplement.
Not appropriate for
- Training a deep radiogenomic model end to end. - Around 26 paired cases is far too few; the result would not generalize.HUMAN
- Population-level claims about lung cancer imaging phenotypes. - Single-institution surgical series with no sampling frame.HUMAN
Who has used it
Articles that analyzed these data, counted separately from articles that only cited the paper. Only the first counts as reuse.
What articles did with it
- Cited the paper202
- Mentioned the dataset1
- Accession found in text4
- Declared using it0
- Analyzed the data3
Against comparable datasets
- Analyzed it3
- Expected~173
METHODS:"GSE28827"), so every dataset in the corpus is counted the same way and the numbers can be compared. The 4 articles listed below were retrieved and graded one at a time, and an article counts as having analyzed the data wherever the accession sits in the analysis - methods, results, tables, figures or supplement - under any of this dataset’s accessions. Read the list as the evidence about these articles, and the count as the number that is comparable across datasets.- 3 article(s) reference this dataset's accession in a methods section, against 172.8 predicted for datasets of comparable size, age, modality breadth and access tier (reuse gap index -5.44 on a log2 scale, 1st percentile of the assessed corpus).
- Its publications are cited 202 times, about 67 citations for every article that analyzed the data - the dataset is known but little used.
Original publication
Articles that analyzed the data
Community examples
Share your exampleAnalyses someone ran on these data end to end, each with a receipt recording when it ran, against which packages and for how long.
Which cohorts have both imaging and molecular data on the same patients, and how many patients actually carry both?
Join the same patients across two NCI repositories
- Open GDC and IDC APIs, no account required
- pandas
- Patient-level intersection between a GDC project and an IDC collection
- Counts of molecular-only, imaging-only and joined patients
- A map of every cohort present in both repositories
- A chart comparing molecular and imaging patient counts per linkable cohort
Steps
- Retrieve patient identifiers from the GDC project
- Query IDC's public SQL endpoint for the collection's patient identifiers
- Intersect on the shared barcode and quantify the overlap
- Sweep every GDC project against every IDC collection
Start here
Starter code generated from this record’s own identifiers, then the access steps.
Get the data in code
IDC: pull the DICOM collection with idc-indexpython
from idc_index import IDCClient
COLLECTION = "nsclc_radiogenomics"
client = IDCClient()
series = client.index[client.index["collection_id"] == COLLECTION] # one row per DICOM series
print(len(series), "series,", series["PatientID"].nunique(), "patients,",
round(series["series_size_MB"].sum() / 1024, 1), "GB")
print(series["Modality"].value_counts().to_dict())
# Everything above is an index lookup and costs nothing. Uncomment to pull the pixels;
# the client refuses up front if the disk cannot hold them.
# client.download_from_selection(collection_id=COLLECTION, downloadDir="./nsclc_radiogenomics")This page as data: limitations firstbash
curl -s https://cd2s.vercel.app/data/datasets/idc-nsclc-radiogenomics.json | python3 -c '
import json, sys
r = json.load(sys.stdin)
for l in r["limitations"]:
print(l["severity"].upper(), "-", l["statement"][:120])
print("survival endpoint:", r["longitudinal"]["has_survival_endpoint"], "| treatment response:", r["longitudinal"]["has_treatment_response"])'Access steps
- Explore the collection in the Imaging Data CommonsFor people
Fully open. No account, no data access request.
https://portal.imaging.datacommons.cancer.gov/explore/?collection_id=nsclc_radiogenomics - Pull DICOM with the idc-index Python packageFor people
pip install idc-index python -c " from idc_index import IDCClient c = IDCClient() s = c.index[c.index['collection_id'] == 'nsclc_radiogenomics'] print(len(s), 'series', round(s['series_size_MB'].sum() / 1024, 1), 'GB') c.download_from_selection(collection_id='nsclc_radiogenomics', downloadDir='.') " - Retrieve the matched expression series from GEO and verify the identifier joinFor peoplehttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE28827
- List the series before pulling pixelsFor agents
List modality and size first so an agent can choose what to fetch.
https://learn.canceridc.dev/python - <<'PY' from idc_index import IDCClient i = IDCClient().index s = i[i["collection_id"] == "nsclc_radiogenomics"] print(len(s), "series", s["PatientID"].nunique(), "patients", round(s["series_size_MB"].sum() / 1024, 1), "GB") print(s["Modality"].value_counts().to_dict()) PY
Provenance
All of it, and more, is in this record’s JSON.
Identifiers
- IDC collectionnsclc_radiogenomicsAPI
- TCIA collectionNSCLC RadiogenomicsAPI
- GEO seriesTEXT
- DOITEXT
Versions and verification
- Released
- 1 Jan 2012
- Metadata retrieved
- 18 Sept 2026
- Review status
- Project-curatedCD2S project curation on 18 Sept 2026
- Data generation funding
- Role not established
- The collection description states that 26 of the cases have matched microarray data in GEO series GSE28827, with DICOM patient names matching microarray sample names. Confirm the join works as described before designing around it.
Funding
Funded data generation
- U01CA142555Computerized Quantitative Imaging Assessment of Tumor BurdenDaniel L RubinAPI2
- R01CA160251Tools for Linking and Mining image and Genomic Data in Non-Small Cell Lung CancerSANDY A. NAPEL, SYLVIA KATINA PLEVRITISAPI2
- U01CA190214Qualification and Deployment of Imaging Biomarkers of Cancer Treatment ResponseDaniel L RubinAPI
- U01CA187947Computing, Optimizing, and Evaluating Quantitative Cancer Imaging BiomarkersSANDY A. NAPEL, Daniel L RubinAPI
Funded infrastructure or harmonization
- U54CA149145MODELING THE ROLE OF DIFFERENTIATION IN AMLGarry P Nolan, SYLVIA KATINA PLEVRITISAPI
- P30CA124435Leadership, Planning and EvaluationSTEVEN E ARTANDI, MANISHA DESAIAPI