HIV+ Tumor Molecular Characterization Project - Cervical Cancer
212 cervical carcinomas from Ugandan women, 98% Black African and enriched for HIV infection - the largest genomically characterized cervical cancer cohort from sub-Saharan Africa, with ECOG status on 99% of cases, treatment outcome on 68%, and a derivable follow-up time for every single case.
Can it answer your research question?
4 of 6 supportedOverall survival
SupportedVital status and time are populated; median follow-up 1.1 years; 212 cases with follow-up; endpoint: overall survival.API
Progression or recurrence
Limitedprogression_or_recurrenceis informative for 8% of cases.APITreatment response
Supporteddisease_responseis populated for 100% of cases; criteria: complete response, partial response.APIWhich drug was given
Supportedtherapeutic_agentsis recorded for 30% of cases.APIStage-adjusted modelling
Not supportedajcc_pathologic_stageis informative for no case in the harmonized records.APIAnalysis by race or ethnicity
SupportedRace is informative for 98% of cases.API
At a glance
Every percentage is the repository’s own record of what is filled inSubjectCALC
As filed by the repository
Who is in the cohortAPI
- Sex212 female
- Race207 black or african american · 4 unknown · 1 not reported
- Ethnicity100 not hispanic or latino · 1 hispanic or latino · 82 unknown · 29 not reported
- Vital status116 dead · 96 alive
Age at diagnosis
What was measured, and on how many
- Clinical212 of 212 · 100%
- Whole-slide tissue images211 of 212 · >99%
- DICOM medical imaging211 of 212 · >99%
- Whole genome sequencing124 of 212 · 58%
- Copy Number Variation124 of 212 · 58%
- Somatic Structural Variation124 of 212 · 58%
- Bulk RNA sequencing123 of 212 · 58%
- DNA methylation array120 of 212 · 57%
- microRNA sequencing118 of 212 · 56%
- Targeted DNA panel sequencing89 of 212 · 42%
Platform, files and data levels
| Assay | Platform | Files | Levels |
|---|---|---|---|
| ClinicalAPI | - | 216 | - |
| Whole-slide tissue imagesAPI | illumina | 525 | - |
| DICOM medical imagingAPI | - | - | DICOM series |
| Whole genome sequencingAPI | illumina | 2,533 | - |
| Copy Number VariationAPI | - | 640 | - |
| Somatic Structural VariationAPI | - | 640 | - |
| Bulk RNA sequencingAPI | illumina | 1,372 | - |
| DNA methylation arrayAPI | illumina | 360 | - |
| microRNA sequencingAPI | illumina | 570 | - |
| Targeted DNA panel sequencingAPI | illumina | 1,366 | - |
How complete all 29 clinical fields are - 16 informative for at least 80% of cases
Outcome
Follow-up
Treatment
Diagnosis
Demographics
Access
Data Access Request through dbGaP using an eRA Commons account; institutional signing official approval required
- Open components
- 2,457 open-access files
- Controlled components
- 4,703 controlled-access files
- Typical turnaround
- days to a few weeks after signing official approval
- License
- NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy terms
- Citation requirement
- Cite the dataset accession and the program's publication guidelines; see the GDC publication policy.
What it is good for
Written and checked by a reviewer, not generated from metadata.
1. Does HPV clade shape the tumor epigenome and transcriptome differently in an African cohort than in the predominantly North American and European cohorts that define current cervical cancer subtypes?
Needs approved accessn ≈ 118HUMANMethylation arrays are available on 120 cases and RNA sequencing on 123, on the same tumors as whole genome sequencing that can be used to type and subclassify the integrated HPV. This is the design the marker paper used, and the cohort is large enough to repeat it with different clade groupings or to test subtype assignments derived from TCGA-CESC against an independent, differently constituted population.
Statistical note: Analyses restricted to the intersection of methylation and expression leave roughly 118 cases; clade subgroups below about 25 cases will not support multiple-testing corrected genome-wide comparisons.
NeedsDNA methylationBulk RNA sequencingWhole genome sequencingdiagnoses.primary_diagnosisdemographic.race2. Do molecular subtypes derived from predominantly white cohorts transfer to Black African patients, or do they misclassify tumors in this population?
Needs approved accessn ≈ 120HUMAN207 of 212 cases are recorded as Black or African American, making this the only cohort in this corpus where a non-white group constitutes more than half the participants. Expression and methylation data allow subtype classifiers trained on TCGA to be applied directly, and classifier failure is itself the finding.
Statistical note: Because the cohort is nearly homogeneous by race, this is a transfer-validation design rather than a within-cohort disparities comparison; there is no internal white comparison group.
NeedsBulk RNA sequencingDNA methylationdemographic.race3. Which molecular features are associated with performance status and with response to chemoradiation in a setting where platinum-based chemoradiation is the dominant treatment?
Needs approved accessn ≈ 144HUMANECOG performance status is informative on 98.6% of cases, which is exceptional - most GDC projects record it for none. Treatment type is populated for every case, therapeutic agents for 29.7% (cisplatin, paclitaxel and carboplatin are the commonest), and a treatment outcome field is populated for 67.9%. Together these support a response analysis that is impossible in most cohorts of this size.
Statistical note: Roughly 144 cases have a populated treatment outcome. Response categories are unevenly distributed and the outcome field is one-to-many, so collapse to a binary responder definition per case before modeling and pre-register that definition.
NeedsBulk RNA sequencingTreatment recordsClinical datafollow_ups.ecog_performance_statusdiagnoses.treatments.treatment_outcomediagnoses.treatments.therapeutic_agents4. How do survival patterns in this cohort compare with cervical cancer cohorts from high-income settings, given a median follow-up of only 13.2 months?
Answerable as shippedn ≈ 212HUMANVital status is informative for 100% of cases and follow-up time is computable, giving a usable overall survival endpoint. The short follow-up is itself scientifically interesting because it reflects real-world attrition in the setting where the cohort was recruited.
Statistical note: Median follow-up is 13.2 months and the maximum is 32.7, so late events are not observed. Report restricted mean survival time or landmark analyses rather than median overall survival, and do not compare medians directly against cohorts with five-year follow-up.
NeedsClinical dataOutcome datademographic.vital_statusdiagnoses.days_to_last_follow_up5. Can radiology and histopathology images from this cohort be used to build or validate imaging models on a population that is absent from almost every public imaging training set?
Needs another datasetn ≈ 211HUMANHistopathology and radiology are both available for 211 of 212 cases, alongside the molecular data. Imaging models trained largely on North American and European cohorts have documented performance gaps on under-represented populations, and this is one of the few resources that permits an external check.
Statistical note: Suitable for external validation rather than primary training; 211 cases is small for training a deep model from scratch.
NeedsHistopathology slidesRadiology imagingBulk RNA sequencing
What it cannot tell you
Written by a reviewer against the source, not inferred from what is missing.
Tumor stage is not populated for any case in the GDC harmonized clinical records - both AJCC pathologic stage and AJCC clinical stage are empty for all 212 cases. Since stage is the dominant prognostic factor in cervical cancer, any survival model built from these records alone is unadjusted for the single most important covariate.
Affects: Multivariable survival modeling; Prognostic biomarker discovery; Any comparison of outcomes against staged cohorts
Mitigation: The marker publication reports stage information, so it exists outside the harmonized records. Obtain it from the publication's supplementary material or through the dbGaP phenotype files before claiming any stage-adjusted result.
HIV status is not available as a structured field, despite being the organizing scientific rationale for the cohort. Neither CD4 count nor antiretroviral therapy history appears in the harmonized clinical records.
Affects: Any HIV-stratified comparison; Immune-context analyses
Mitigation: Request the full phenotype file through dbGaP. Do not assume HIV positivity for all participants: the project name describes the study population, not a guarantee about every case.
Median follow-up is 13.2 months with a maximum of 32.7, derivable for all 212 cases. Events accumulate over a much longer horizon in cervical cancer, so the observed survival experience is heavily right-censored.
Affects: Median overall survival estimates; Five-year survival comparisons
Mitigation: Use restricted mean survival time over a horizon the data support, or landmark analysis. State the follow-up distribution explicitly in any comparison.
Ethnicity is recorded as unknown or not reported for 111 of 212 cases, and the cohort is drawn from a single geographic setting. Findings describe Ugandan cervical cancer patients and should not be generalised to Black populations elsewhere, whose exposure and treatment contexts differ substantially.
Affects: Generalization to African-ancestry populations outside Uganda
Mitigation: Frame results as specific to this cohort and setting, and report the recruitment context alongside any ancestry claim.
Of 7,160 files, 4,703 are controlled access. Sequence-level data including the whole genome sequencing require an approved dbGaP data access request; only 2,457 files can be downloaded without approval.
Affects: Any analysis requiring raw or aligned sequence data
Mitigation: Start the dbGaP request before planning the analysis, and check whether derived open-access files answer the question first.
Not appropriate for
- Estimating cervical cancer incidence or population-level disease burden. - This is a convenience sample of patients presenting to participating centres, not a population-based registry. It carries no denominator and no sampling frame.HUMAN
- Stage-adjusted prognostic modeling using only the GDC clinical records. - Stage is empty for all 212 cases in those records, so a model cannot adjust for it no matter how it is specified.HUMAN
- Comparing HIV-positive and HIV-negative tumor biology within the cohort. - HIV status is not present as a structured variable in the harmonized records, so the comparison cannot be constructed without obtaining additional controlled phenotype data.HUMAN
Who has used it
Articles that analyzed these data, counted separately from articles that only cited the paper. Only the first counts as reuse.
What articles did with it
- Cited the paper70
- Mentioned the dataset2
- Accession found in text0
- Declared using it5
- Analyzed the data21
Against comparable datasets
- Analyzed it21
- Expected~44
- Reuse is within the expected range for comparable datasets (index -1.04).
Original publication
Articles that analyzed the data
Community examples
Share your exampleAnalyses someone ran on these data end to end, each with a receipt recording when it ran, against which packages and for how long.
Which classes of analysis do this cohort's clinical records actually support, and which are ruled out before I request access?
Audit whether this dataset can answer your question
- A GDC project identifier
- Network access to api.gdc.cancer.gov
- Per-field coverage table separating populated from informative values
- Assay coverage as a percentage of the cohort
- A yes/no verdict for six common analysis classes
- A chart contrasting populated with informative coverage, field by field
Steps
- Fetch project summary and per-assay case counts
- Request facet counts for the clinical fields that gate common analyses
- Separate absent fields from fields populated with non-answers
- Flag one-to-many fields where per-case percentages cannot be inferred
- Retrieve case-level fields and test whether a survival endpoint is derivable
- Print a verdict for each analysis class
Is performance status associated with response to chemoradiation, and which agents were actually given?
Treatment response, after checking the response field is real
- Open GDC clinical records for CGCI-HTMCP-CC
- scipy, pandas
- Separation of genuine response categories from disease-status codes
- Per-case responder/progressor labels under a stated rule
- Mann-Whitney comparison of ECOG between response groups
- Agent frequency table
- A two-panel chart of response composition and ECOG by response group
Steps
- Facet the two response-bearing fields and classify their values
- Collapse one-to-many treatment records to one label per case
- Compare performance status between response groups
- Tabulate the therapeutic agents actually recorded
Given a research goal, which dataset should an agent choose, and what must it refuse to do with it?
Select a dataset the way an agent should
- The CD2S structured export
- pandas
- Contrast between a size-ranked and a capability-ranked selection
- A transparent fit score favoring under-used resources
- Blocking limitations read before committing
- A machine-readable task brief for the next step
- A chart of the ranked fit scores with the selected cohort highlighted
Steps
- Load the structured index
- Show what a naive size-ranked selection returns
- Filter on measured capability rather than description
- Rank on fit, rewarding under-used datasets
- Read blocking limitations from the full record
- Emit a task brief including what the agent must not do
Start here
Starter code generated from this record’s own identifiers, then the access steps.
Get the data in code
GDC: list open files and download thempython
import json, requests
PROJECT = "CGCI-HTMCP-CC"
filters = {"op": "and", "content": [
{"op": "in", "content": {"field": "cases.project.project_id", "value": [PROJECT]}},
{"op": "in", "content": {"field": "access", "value": ["open"]}},
]}
params = {"filters": json.dumps(filters),
"fields": "file_id,file_name,data_category,data_type,file_size",
"size": "10000", "format": "JSON"}
files = requests.get("https://api.gdc.cancer.gov/files", params=params, timeout=60).json()["data"]["hits"]
print(len(files), "open files")
# Write a manifest and fetch with the GDC client (https://gdc.cancer.gov/access-data/gdc-data-transfer-tool)
with open("manifest.txt", "w") as fh:
fh.write("id\n" + "\n".join(f["file_id"] for f in files))
# $ gdc-client download -m manifest.txtGDC: clinical table for every casepython
import json, requests
filters = {"op": "in", "content": {"field": "project.project_id", "value": ["CGCI-HTMCP-CC"]}}
params = {"filters": json.dumps(filters), "size": "5000", "format": "TSV",
"fields": ",".join([
"submitter_id", "demographic.vital_status", "demographic.days_to_death",
"diagnoses.days_to_last_follow_up", "diagnoses.ajcc_pathologic_stage",
"diagnoses.treatments.treatment_type", "diagnoses.treatments.treatment_outcome"])}
tsv = requests.get("https://api.gdc.cancer.gov/cases", params=params, timeout=60).text
open("CGCI-HTMCP-CC_clinical.tsv", "w").write(tsv)IDC: pull the DICOM collection with idc-indexpython
from idc_index import IDCClient
COLLECTION = "cgci_htmcp_cc"
client = IDCClient()
series = client.index[client.index["collection_id"] == COLLECTION] # one row per DICOM series
print(len(series), "series,", series["PatientID"].nunique(), "patients,",
round(series["series_size_MB"].sum() / 1024, 1), "GB")
print(series["Modality"].value_counts().to_dict())
# Everything above is an index lookup and costs nothing. Uncomment to pull the pixels;
# the client refuses up front if the disk cannot hold them.
# client.download_from_selection(collection_id=COLLECTION, downloadDir="./cgci_htmcp_cc")This page as data: limitations firstbash
curl -s https://cd2s.vercel.app/data/datasets/gdc-cgci-htmcp-cc.json | python3 -c '
import json, sys
r = json.load(sys.stdin)
for l in r["limitations"]:
print(l["severity"].upper(), "-", l["statement"][:120])
print("survival endpoint:", r["longitudinal"]["has_survival_endpoint"], "| treatment response:", r["longitudinal"]["has_treatment_response"])'Access steps
- Read the marker publication firstFor people
The Nature Genetics paper describes the recruitment setting, HPV typing approach and the clinical variables that exist outside the harmonized records. It will tell you whether the variables your analysis needs are obtainable at all.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32747824/ - Explore the open-access files without any approvalFor people
2,457 of 7,160 files are open. Derived expression, copy number and methylation products are enough to scope the analysis and check that the cohort fits before you invest in an access request.
https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/projects/CGCI-HTMCP-CC# Open-access file manifest for this project, no credentials required curl -s 'https://api.gdc.cancer.gov/files' \ --get \ --data-urlencode 'filters={"op":"and","content":[ {"op":"in","content":{"field":"cases.project.project_id","value":["CGCI-HTMCP-CC"]}}, {"op":"in","content":{"field":"access","value":["open"]}}]}' \ --data-urlencode 'fields=file_id,file_name,data_category,data_type' \ --data-urlencode 'size=2000&format=TSV' > htmcp_cc_open_files.tsv - Submit a dbGaP data access request for the controlled tierFor people
Needed for whole genome sequencing and any sequence-level analysis. You will need an eRA Commons account and your institutional signing official. Request the full phenotype file at the same time - that is where stage and HIV-related variables are most likely to live.
https://gdc.cancer.gov/access-data/obtaining-access-controlled-data - Download with the GDC clientFor people
Once approved, use the GDC Data Transfer Tool with your token. Do not put the token on a command line or into a script that is committed anywhere.
https://gdc.cancer.gov/access-data/gdc-data-transfer-tool - Query the project from code, with no credentialsFor agents
The file index is public even where files are not, so an agent can size the cohort before anyone requests access.
https://docs.gdc.cancer.gov/API/Users_Guide/Getting_Started/curl -s 'https://api.gdc.cancer.gov/files' --get \ --data-urlencode 'filters={"op":"in","content":{"field":"cases.project.project_id","value":["CGCI-HTMCP-CC"]}}' \ --data-urlencode 'fields=file_id,file_name,data_type' \ --data-urlencode 'size=10000' --data-urlencode 'format=TSV' - Pass the token when the agent needs controlled filesFor agents
Without a token, an API query may return only the open subset. Compare returned counts with the record before treating them as the whole cohort.
https://docs.gdc.cancer.gov/API/Users_Guide/Getting_Started/curl -H "X-Auth-Token: $GDC_TOKEN" https://api.gdc.cancer.gov/data/<file_id>
Provenance
All of it, and more, is in this record’s JSON.
Identifiers
- GDC projectCGCI-HTMCP-CCAPI
- GDC programAPI
- dbGaP studyphs000528API
- IDC collectioncgci_htmcp_ccAPI
- TCIA collectionCGCI-HTMCP-CCAPI
- ZenodoTEXT
Versions and verification
- Released
- 1 Jan 2020
- Metadata retrieved
- 18 Sept 2026
- Review status
- Project-curatedCD2S project curation on 18 Sept 2026
- Data generation funding
- Funded data generation
- HIV status, CD4 count and antiretroviral therapy history are central to this cohort's scientific value but are not exposed as structured fields in the GDC harmonized clinical records. Confirm with the CGCI data access committee whether they are available in the dbGaP phenotype files before planning an HIV-stratified analysis.
- Stage is unpopulated in GDC for all 212 cases. The marker paper reports stage distribution, so it exists somewhere; confirm whether it can be obtained from the supplementary tables or only through controlled access.
Funding
Funded data generation
- U01CA217842Integrative bioinformatics and functional characterization of oncogenic driver aberrations in cancerBenjamin Deneen, GORDON B. MILLSAPI2
- U01CA096230AIDS and Cancer Specimen Resource Central Office and Data Coordinating CenterMICHAEL Shannon MCGRATHAPI2
- U01CA066535The East Coast AIDS and Cancer Specimen ResourceSYLVIA SILVER, JAN M ORENSTEINAPI2
- P50CA098258MD Anderson Gynecologic SPORE for Uterine CancersRUSSELL R BROADDUS, Karen Hsieh LuAPI2
Funded reuse of these data
- R21CA241013Defining HPV integration sites of unknown significance in invasive cervical cancerJanet S. RaderAPI
- R01CA262198Enlisting HPV integration events to illuminate drivers and target treatment in invasive cervical cancerJanet S. RaderAPI