Skip to content
Datasets/brain_cptac_2020

Pediatric Brain Cancer (CPTAC/CHOP, Cell 2020)

OpenMachine-extracted
Investigator-initiated cohort (harmonized in cBioPortal)Available from cBioPortal

Integrated proteogenomic characterization across major histological types of pediatric brain cancer . We report a comprehensive proteogenomics analysis, including whole-genome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and proteomics and phosphoproteomics profiling, of 218 tumors across 7 histological types of childhood brain cancer: low-grade glioma (n = 93), ependymoma (32), high-grade glioma (25), medulloblastoma (22), ganglio-glioma (18), craniopharyngioma (16), and atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (12). Proteomics data identify common biological themes that span histological boundaries, suggesting that treatments used for one histological type may be applied effectively to other tumors sharing similar proteomics features. Immune landscape characterization reveals diverse tumor microenvironments across and within diagnoses. Proteomics data further reveal functional effects of somatic mutations and copy number variations (CNVs) not evident in transcriptomics data.

Can it answer your research question?

3 of 6 supported
  • Overall survival

    Supported

    Vital status and time are populated; median follow-up 2.9 years; 192 cases with follow-up; endpoints: overall survival, disease-free interval.API

  • Progression or recurrence

    Supported

    A time to event is derivable: disease-free interval; progression_or_recurrence is informative for 100% of cases.API

  • Treatment response

    Not supported

    No treatment response is recorded in the harmonized records.API

  • Which drug was given

    Not measured

    This field was not among those probed for this repository.

  • Stage-adjusted modelling

    Not measured

    This field was not among those probed for this repository.

  • Analysis by race or ethnicity

    Supported

    RACE is informative for 100% of cases.API

Judged from the repository’s own field completeness (thresholds). “Not measured” means we have not probed that field for this record, not that the data lack it.

At a glance

Every percentage is the repository’s own record of what is filled in
CasesAPI
199
218 samples
Measurement types
4
Follow-upAPI
2.9 years
for 192 of 199 cases; overall survival, disease-free interval
Treatment responseAPI
Not recorded

SubjectCALC

Brain and central nervous system

As filed by the repository

CNS/Braintissue

Who is in the cohortAPI

A usable value“Not reported” or “unknown”No value recorded
  • Sex116 Male · 83 Female
  • Race146 White · 27 Other/Unavailable/Not Reported · 18 Black or African American · 8 3 other
  • Ethnicity184 Not Hispanic or Latino · 13 Hispanic or Latino · 2 Unavailable/Not Reported
  • Vital status159 LIVING · 40 DECEASED

What was measured, and on how many

4 measurement types, 2 covering the whole cohort.

  • Mutation calls (panel, exome or genome)218 of 218 samples · 100%
  • Copy number alterations190 of 218 samples · 87%
  • RNA sequencing expression188 of 218 samples · 86%
  • Reverse phase protein array218 of 218 samples · 100%
Platform, files and data levels
AssayPlatformFilesLevels
Mutation calls (panel, exome or genome)API--processed matrix
Copy number alterationsAPI--processed matrix
RNA sequencing expressionAPI--processed matrix
Reverse phase protein arrayAPI--processed matrix
How complete all 8 clinical fields are - 8 informative for at least 80% of cases

A field counts as informative only when it holds a real value. “Not reported” blocks an analysis just as a missing field does. Fields marked 1:n can hold several records per case, so they show the share of cases with any record.

Informative - a usable valuePresent but uninformative - “not reported” or “unknown”Absent - no value recorded

Outcome

  • DFS StatusAPI100%
  • OS StatusAPI100%
  • DFS MonthsAPI97%

Follow-up

  • OS MonthsAPI97%

Diagnosis

  • Oncotree CodeAPI100%

Demographics

Access

OpenDownload without an account.API

Processed data download from the cBioPortal study page or its public REST API; no account required. Primary raw data remain wherever the original investigators deposited them.

Open components
harmonized mutation, copy-number, expression and clinical files
License
Per-study terms; cBioPortal asks that the original study be cited
Citation requirement
Cite the original publication, and cite cBioPortal if the portal's harmonized files were used.

What it is good for

Written and checked by a reviewer, not generated from metadata.

No reviewed research questions yet. The measurements and field completeness above are machine-extracted and still useful for judging fit.

What it cannot tell you

Written by a reviewer against the source, not inferred from what is missing.

No reviewed limitations yet. Check the field completeness chart above before committing to an analysis. Low coverage on an endpoint you need is the most common blocker.

Who has used it

Articles that analyzed these data, counted separately from articles that only cited the paper. Only the first counts as reuse.

Analyzed the dataCALC
-
could not be measured for this dataset
Declared using it
-
named in a data availability statement
Cited the paper
283
attention to the publication, not reuse of the data
Against expectation
Not assessed
Reuse cannot be traced for this dataset
No accession is specific enough to search the literature for, so we cannot tell how often these data have been reused. That is a limit of the measurement, not a finding about the dataset. It is also a barrier in itself: a researcher cannot find prior work to build on.
Reuse assessment
  • Not assessed: this dataset has no accession specific enough for citation-based reuse tracing, so a shortfall cannot be measured.

Compared against rgi-huber-v2. See Methods for the model.

Original publication

Articles that analyzed the data

Not searchable. See the note above.

Community examples

Share your example

Analyses someone ran on these data end to end, each with a receipt recording when it ran, against which packages and for how long.

Nobody has shared an analysis of this dataset yet. The examples on other datasets cover the common patterns and can be adapted - and if you adapt one, it belongs here.

Start here

Starter code generated from this record’s own identifiers, then the access steps.

Get the data in code

cBioPortal: clinical data and the full study bundlepython
import requests, pandas as pd

STUDY = "brain_cptac_2020"
base = "https://www.cbioportal.org/api"
clin = requests.get(f"{base}/studies/{STUDY}/clinical-data",
                    params={"clinicalDataType": "PATIENT", "projection": "SUMMARY"}, timeout=60).json()
patients = pd.DataFrame(clin).pivot_table(index="patientId", columns="clinicalAttributeId",
                                          values="value", aggfunc="first")
print(patients.shape)
profiles = requests.get(f"{base}/studies/{STUDY}/molecular-profiles", timeout=60).json()
print([p["molecularProfileId"] for p in profiles])
# Whole study as flat files: https://cbioportal-datahub.s3.amazonaws.com/brain_cptac_2020.tar.gz
This page as data: limitations firstbash
curl -s https://cd2s.vercel.app/data/datasets/cbio-brain-cptac-2020.json | python3 -c '
import json, sys
r = json.load(sys.stdin)
for l in r["limitations"]:
    print(l["severity"].upper(), "-", l["statement"][:120])
print("survival endpoint:", r["longitudinal"]["has_survival_endpoint"], "| treatment response:", r["longitudinal"]["has_treatment_response"])'

Access steps

  1. 1
    Open the study in cBioPortalFor people5 minutes

    Harmonized molecular and clinical files are open. Cite the original publication, and cite cBioPortal if the portal's harmonized files were used.

    https://www.cbioportal.org/study/summary?id=brain_cptac_2020

    Generated from repository policy. Check the linked policy before downloading.

  2. 2
    Download the whole study as a zipFor peopleminutes

    The datasets page carries the staging files used by the portal.

    https://www.cbioportal.org/datasets

    Generated from repository policy. Check the linked policy before downloading.

  3. 3
    Or pull the staging files with git-lfsFor people

    Study folders are named by study id under public/.

    git clone https://github.com/cBioPortal/datahub.git && cd datahub
    git -c lfs.fetchexclude="" lfs pull -I public/brain_cptac_2020
    https://github.com/cBioPortal/datahub

    Generated from repository policy. Check the linked policy before downloading.

  4. 4
    Read the study straight from the REST APIFor agents

    No key is required; pace requests when sweeping many studies.

    curl -s 'https://www.cbioportal.org/api/studies/brain_cptac_2020/clinical-data?clinicalDataType=PATIENT&projection=SUMMARY'
    https://docs.cbioportal.org/web-api-and-clients/

    Generated from repository policy. Check the linked policy before downloading.

Provenance

All of it, and more, is in this record’s JSON.

Identifiers

Versions and verification

Metadata retrieved
18 Sept 2026
Review status
Machine-extracted
Data generation funding
Funded data generation

Funding

Awards resolved through NIH RePORTER. Awards that paid to generate these data are listed apart from awards that paid to reuse them. Both are returns on NCI investment, but different ones.

Funded data generation

  • U24CA210993Systems Biology based Proteogenomic Translator for Cancer Marker Discovery towards Precision MedicineERIC E SCHADT, Pei WangFY2016-2020API
  • U24CA210985The Comprehensive Proteome Characterization Center at Johns Hopkins: High Precision Discovery and Confirmation of Genoproteomic TargetsDANIEL Wanyui CHAN, ZHEN ZHANGFY2016-2020API
  • U24CA210979Integrated high throughput proteogenomic data analysis center for CPTACChet Birger, GAD A GETZFY2016-2020API
  • U24CA210972Proteogenomic Data Analysis for Cancer Systems Biology and Clinical TranslationLi Ding, David FenyoFY2016-2020API
  • U24CA210967University of Michigan Proteogenomics Data Analysis CenterARUL M CHINNAIYAN, Saravana M DhanasekaranFY2016-2020API
  • U24CA210955PNNL Proteome Characterization CenterTao Liu, RICHARD D SMITHFY2016-2020API
  • U24CA210954iPGDAC, An Integrative Proteogenomic Data Analysis Center for CPTACBing ZhangFY2016-2020API
  • U01CA214114Proteogenomic studies aimed at understanding ovarian tumor responses to agents targeting the DNA damage response and translating this knowledge into clinical benefitMichael Birrer, AMANDA G PAULOVICHFY2017-2021API
  • R50CA211499A proteomics research specialist in developing targeted mass spectrometry methods for quantifying proteins important in cancerJeff WhiteakerFY2016-2026API
  • P30CA008748Antitumor AssessmentElisa de Stanchina, FRANCESCA M GANYFY2025-2026API

For softwarerecord JSON